Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgmiller

(715 posts)
7. I can't believe I'm saying this but I give Thomas a little credit in his dissent
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:03 AM
10 hrs ago

Alito's dissent was basically what you would expect but Thomas at least attempted to find some logic to the dissent which seems to be at least partially why Gorsuch joined it. From what I can see he bases it on if the parents of the person who is born her is now living here and has moved from their home country. In other words he seems to want to say that if someone is just visiting even for a year but they maintain a home in another country then they have not moved here permanently. In the end I disagree with him because that's not what the 14th says but at least he tried to be logical.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #1
It would have been a huge surprise if it was unanimous. onenote 10 hrs ago #3
Strange, isn't it..... SergeStorms 8 hrs ago #33
Should have been 9-0 Deminpenn 10 hrs ago #5
Not surprised that it wasn't 9-0 Old Crank 10 hrs ago #6
I didn't see how divided it was... could you tell me? I'm headed out the door on errands... thanks! slightlv 10 hrs ago #8
6-3 decision LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #11
Five to Three.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #2
5-3 SMDH slightlv 10 hrs ago #9
Yes, 5 to 3 is disappointing, maybe... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #12
It would have been a surprise if it were a unanimous decision. J_William_Ryan 10 hrs ago #4
I can't believe I'm saying this but I give Thomas a little credit in his dissent jgmiller 10 hrs ago #7
I see what you are saying... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #14
The debate point seemed to be focused on the term "domicile" BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #18
I was thinking they would tweak the visitor LeftInTX 9 hrs ago #29
I'm upset that I . . . AverageOldGuy 10 hrs ago #10
So does this mean alito is no longer an "originalist?" MoseShrute 10 hrs ago #13
"Originalist" and "Textualist" are basically scams.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #16
it means he's a racist liar (also a misogynist and theofascist) LymphocyteLover 9 hrs ago #21
It only applies when you agree with what it says! Callie1979 8 hrs ago #30
I'm actually surprised. Gaytano70 10 hrs ago #15
I would have liked 9 to 0... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #17
Same. YodaMom2 9 hrs ago #25
From Robert's opinion Danmel 9 hrs ago #19
Super important point-- this issue isn't going away for the rightwing. We HAVE to fix the court. LymphocyteLover 9 hrs ago #20
But Roe was never an Amendment. Callie1979 8 hrs ago #32
Yeah, but the point is they have their teeth in this one and are unlikely to let go LymphocyteLover 5 hrs ago #42
The court got this one right. republianmushroom 9 hrs ago #22
It was 5/4 Dangling0826 9 hrs ago #23
What?!??!! The thugs and hacks on the Supreme Court actually READ the Constitution? NNadir 9 hrs ago #24
Judge Thomas DonCoquixote 9 hrs ago #26
He got his... Kablooie 8 hrs ago #36
The law isn't important to Trump. What is important to him is his racist signaling to his adoring base, and he has Doodley 9 hrs ago #27
Relieved, but thought it would 7-2 LeftInTX 9 hrs ago #28
Yay! But... what's next? WestMichRad 8 hrs ago #31
I support our next Democratic president throwing spaghetti at the wall with outlandish overreach too! ffr 8 hrs ago #34
Three of them.., Kablooie 8 hrs ago #35
Marco Rubio and JD Vance are going to be crushed. Aristus 7 hrs ago #37
It's scary how close this was fujiyamasan 7 hrs ago #38
even roberts can't undo a fucking amendment. big fucking DUH! pansypoo53219 7 hrs ago #39
I love how liberals are accused of legislating from the bench lakercub 7 hrs ago #40
One less thing to worry about for now. mtngirl47 6 hrs ago #41
Good. Thankful. Plenty of MAGAts were looking to throw me out IronLionZion 3 hrs ago #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court upholds bir...»Reply #7