Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(173,783 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 10:37 AM 10 hrs ago

Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, blocks Trump order [View all]

Source: CNBC

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT Updated 2 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

“Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause,” the majority decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts said.

Roberts was joined by his fellow conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with the court’s three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the majority ruling on 14th Amendment grounds.

Another conservative, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, wrote that he did not believe Trump’s executive order violated the 14th Amendment, but that it “does contravene a federal statute” adopted in 1940 that addresses the citizenship of people born in the U.S. The court’s justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/30/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-ruling.html



Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-365_4hdj.pdf


Article updated.

Previous article -

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT Updated 1 Min Ago


The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the right to citizenship for people born in the United States, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump that sought to undo that longstanding constitutional principle for children born to many immigrants.

The court's justices had signaled during oral arguments in April that they would affirm that individuals born in the United States to non-U.S. citizens are automatically granted citizenship. Trump attended the oral arguments for the case, the first sitting president ever to do so. The case is known as Trump v. Barbara.

The citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which was adopted in 1868, says,"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Trump, on his first day back in the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, signed an executive order seeking to undo that right. The order said that 30 days after its effective date, babies born in the U.S. were not entitled to be issued citizenship documents if their parents had immigrated illegally or were undocumented workers.



Original article -

Published Tue, Jun 30 2026 10:35 AM EDT


This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, striking down Trump's order LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #1
It would have been a huge surprise if it was unanimous. onenote 10 hrs ago #3
Strange, isn't it..... SergeStorms 8 hrs ago #33
Should have been 9-0 Deminpenn 10 hrs ago #5
Not surprised that it wasn't 9-0 Old Crank 10 hrs ago #6
I didn't see how divided it was... could you tell me? I'm headed out the door on errands... thanks! slightlv 10 hrs ago #8
6-3 decision LetMyPeopleVote 10 hrs ago #11
Five to Three.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #2
5-3 SMDH slightlv 10 hrs ago #9
Yes, 5 to 3 is disappointing, maybe... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #12
It would have been a surprise if it were a unanimous decision. J_William_Ryan 10 hrs ago #4
I can't believe I'm saying this but I give Thomas a little credit in his dissent jgmiller 10 hrs ago #7
I see what you are saying... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #14
The debate point seemed to be focused on the term "domicile" BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #18
I was thinking they would tweak the visitor LeftInTX 9 hrs ago #29
I'm upset that I . . . AverageOldGuy 10 hrs ago #10
So does this mean alito is no longer an "originalist?" MoseShrute 10 hrs ago #13
"Originalist" and "Textualist" are basically scams.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #16
it means he's a racist liar (also a misogynist and theofascist) LymphocyteLover 9 hrs ago #21
It only applies when you agree with what it says! Callie1979 8 hrs ago #30
I'm actually surprised. Gaytano70 10 hrs ago #15
I would have liked 9 to 0... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #17
Same. YodaMom2 9 hrs ago #25
From Robert's opinion Danmel 9 hrs ago #19
Super important point-- this issue isn't going away for the rightwing. We HAVE to fix the court. LymphocyteLover 9 hrs ago #20
But Roe was never an Amendment. Callie1979 8 hrs ago #32
Yeah, but the point is they have their teeth in this one and are unlikely to let go LymphocyteLover 5 hrs ago #42
The court got this one right. republianmushroom 9 hrs ago #22
It was 5/4 Dangling0826 9 hrs ago #23
What?!??!! The thugs and hacks on the Supreme Court actually READ the Constitution? NNadir 9 hrs ago #24
Judge Thomas DonCoquixote 9 hrs ago #26
He got his... Kablooie 8 hrs ago #36
The law isn't important to Trump. What is important to him is his racist signaling to his adoring base, and he has Doodley 9 hrs ago #27
Relieved, but thought it would 7-2 LeftInTX 9 hrs ago #28
Yay! But... what's next? WestMichRad 8 hrs ago #31
I support our next Democratic president throwing spaghetti at the wall with outlandish overreach too! ffr 8 hrs ago #34
Three of them.., Kablooie 8 hrs ago #35
Marco Rubio and JD Vance are going to be crushed. Aristus 7 hrs ago #37
It's scary how close this was fujiyamasan 7 hrs ago #38
even roberts can't undo a fucking amendment. big fucking DUH! pansypoo53219 7 hrs ago #39
I love how liberals are accused of legislating from the bench lakercub 7 hrs ago #40
One less thing to worry about for now. mtngirl47 6 hrs ago #41
Good. Thankful. Plenty of MAGAts were looking to throw me out IronLionZion 3 hrs ago #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court upholds bir...