Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LeftInTX

(34,953 posts)
11. The sentence length is the key here (consecutive vs concurrent) and if there were problems at trial.
Wed Jun 24, 2026, 12:33 PM
17 hrs ago

I think they were facing 10 year sentences for each charge. But they had numerous charges and the judge just added them up and gave them 50. There are federal sentencing guidelines. These guidelines were used to sentence that Duggar guy on child porn.

I don't know the guidelines on consective vs concurrent, but a "normal" judge would have sentenced them concurrently. Often they are tried on numerous charges in order to get a guilty verdict on at least one and then they are sentenced currently. Found guilty on five charges and sentenced to 10 years or found guilty on one charge and sentenced to 10.

I guess you could call this malicious prosecution. This happened in the Kilmar Abrago Garcia case.

They also used two judges in this case, which is not standard practice.

I think they can get some of this reduced on appeal. However, they certainly weren't "innocent". They try to make like they were peacefully protesting, but they were doing more than that. (Think of Jan 6th)

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The indifference by most Americans tells me a lot about what kind of country we have become. ☮ walkingman 19 hrs ago #1
The way the system is rigged, nothing can change until at least November or even January. PSPS 19 hrs ago #6
I often say: popsdenver 17 hrs ago #14
Maybe it's not indifference. Trueblue Texan 9 hrs ago #29
I hope MAGA realizes these same laws can be used against them if a Dem ever sees the Whitehouse again. n/t SpankMe 19 hrs ago #2
Little comfort relogic 17 hrs ago #10
Well said, Lc popsdenver 17 hrs ago #15
That ship has sailed SpankMe 13 hrs ago #21
Can be? It damn well better be WILL BE, starting at 12:05p on January 20, 2029. Seeking Serenity 16 hrs ago #17
I'll do everything I can to help it happen SpankMe 10 hrs ago #28
At the rate the (conservative) courts Quanto Magnus 12 hrs ago #22
I would imagine that the appeals are already being written and submitted, MarineCombatEngineer 19 hrs ago #3
The sentence length is the key here (consecutive vs concurrent) and if there were problems at trial. LeftInTX 17 hrs ago #11
It's the Fifth Circuit, Jake dpibel 17 hrs ago #12
Kicking with DISGUST! Faux pas 19 hrs ago #4
It's hard to believe this made it all the way to sentencing SpankMe 19 hrs ago #5
suspect that the rather big problem here (and probably including in eyes of the jury) stopdiggin 17 hrs ago #7
We know there was at least one assault weapon MichMan 17 hrs ago #8
If any other weapons had been found... Shipwack 17 hrs ago #13
Also remember that sentenced the husband of one of the protestors who was not walkingman 14 hrs ago #20
Which of course raises many issues about who gets prosecuted for what when guns are involved... TygrBright 16 hrs ago #16
Hypocrisy is a bit obvious UpInArms 16 hrs ago #18
No. It really isn't. And we do not answer this charge by aping the the behavior of mentally deficient stopdiggin 11 hrs ago #23
I believe you misunderstood my post UpInArms 11 hrs ago #24
while mine was directed toward the brain dead idiocy involved stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #25
I do agree UpInArms 10 hrs ago #26
Well, after hearing the evidence, a jury convicted them, and a jury acquitted Rittenhouse. MichMan 10 hrs ago #27
The right wing so desperately wants this case Torchlight 17 hrs ago #9
Almost lost it over this topic yesterday. People don't recognize what is happening before our eyes lostnfound 15 hrs ago #19
Material support is a pretty broad charge and probably unconstitutional questionseverything 8 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'This is injustice': how ...»Reply #11