Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(7,364 posts)
5. The study is very interesting...
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 10:34 PM
14 hrs ago

... One thing that I found surprising is that the authors identify a group of high AI achievers, AI users who report that AI has improved both their productivity and the quality of their work, who are contrasted with low AI achievers.

This reminded me of an article I read several years ago, which I tracked down: ChatGPT Attends University. It too identifies a class of "high AI achievers" and contends that "when colleges ban AI tools like ChatGPT, they (inadvertently) select for the sneaky, savvy students."

In this case, the high achievers are the successful cheaters. The big picture, though, is that, like all cheaters, they are cheating themselves.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»AI is cutting hours of of...»Reply #5