Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Chemical Bill

(3,201 posts)

6. One of his points is that it is unlawful to lie to law enforcement.

Reply to onenote (Reply #2)

Mon May 25, 2026, 05:10 AM

Yesterday

Local LEOs, FBI, or regulatory agencies. It absolutely should be for politicians who are speaking to their constituents. None of that should be considered free speech.

Of course you are correct about our current Supreme Court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Former prosecutor pursued by Trump calls for crackdown on election lies: 'Lying can be held to account' [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

I love Andrew Weissman. He is blessed with intelligence and decency - two Marie Marie Sunday #1

I strongly suspect that such a law wouldn't survive constitutional scrutiny. onenote Sunday #2

And,. It should not... reACTIONary Sunday #3

Propose it anyway! Grins Sunday #5

One of his points is that it is unlawful to lie to law enforcement. Chemical Bill Yesterday #6

Lying must be held accountable delisen Sunday #4

"Politicians must be held accountable if their lies damage democracy" CaptainTruth Yesterday #7