Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

COL Mustard

(8,391 posts)
5. They were expendable.
Tue May 19, 2026, 06:11 PM
Tuesday

The hard calculus is that it was cheaper in the long run for the Army to pay ~$1M in benefits per dead soldier than to spend significantly more in force protection. Whisky Pete will never say that, but it's the truth according to these people.

I am so saddened by that I can't tell you.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Troops say Army ignored r...»Reply #5