Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(46,224 posts)

5. Carroll did not oppose this motion.

Wed May 13, 2026, 08:59 AM

Yesterday

Provided that the additional interest was bonded. Which is what the court did.

It would have helped if the article had provided that bit of relevant information.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.e508a4b2-feae-4592-a6dc-d30f9ed35bb6/gov.uscourts.ca2.e508a4b2-feae-4592-a6dc-d30f9ed35bb6.157.0.pdf

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How many fucking breaks are they gonna give this bluestarone Tuesday #1

Oh, FFS Mz Pip Tuesday #2

Carroll agreed to this action. See post #5 onenote Yesterday #6

American justice is getting to be a joke. IMO republianmushroom Tuesday #3

Why is our court system so cowardly? Why are they SO afraid of Trump? Multichromatic Tuesday #4

Carroll did not oppose this motion. onenote Yesterday #5

Yep. My bad onenote Yesterday #8