Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(181,720 posts)
39. Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article)
Sun May 10, 2026, 03:39 PM
Sunday

At a private event in Washington last month, Mr. Smith, the former special counsel, accused Justice Department leaders of targeting people for prosecution to please and impress the president.



https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/06/us/politics/jack-smith-justice-dept-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.gVA.MAn8.K8-zMDWLFD9u&smid=url-share

Jack Smith, the special counsel who twice indicted President Trump, accused the Justice Department of having been “corrupted” by Trump loyalists he claimed were demolishing its credibility and seeking to undermine the rule of law.

Mr. Smith’s remarks, made last month in a private discussion at the Cosmos Club in Washington, represented his sharpest criticism of the department since leaving his post early last year. They came at a time when Mr. Trump is demanding Mr. Smith be prosecuted for his work as special counsel — an outcome Mr. Smith believes is likely, according to people familiar with his thinking.

“We have a Department of Justice today that targets people for criminal prosecution simply because the president doesn’t like them,” Mr. Smith said in the hourlong discussion on April 20, according to a video obtained by The New York Times.

Mr. Smith, speaking in the deliberate cadence of a prosecutor delivering a closing argument, cited what he cast as the wholesale erosion of the department’s tradition of independence from the White House. “We have a department that fails to investigate cases because they might uncover facts that are inconvenient narratives the president would like to press,” he said.

“We have a department that fails to move on cases because they might uncover facts that are inconvenient to narratives the president would like to press,” added Mr. Smith, who was appointed in late 2022 to investigate Mr. Trump’s post-presidency retention of government documents and his push to overturn the 2020 election.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy Sunday #1
I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter Sunday #18
He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification Sunday #31
I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla Sunday #33
I hope you're right. calimary Yesterday #45
"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan Sunday #2
Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus Sunday #6
Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy Sunday #35
She can't seal the world. Bluetus Sunday #40
She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy Sunday #41
It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom Yesterday #44
Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose Sunday #3
Just think. relogic Sunday #7
He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker Sunday #16
All that information popsdenver Sunday #21
Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix Sunday #36
Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose Sunday #37
Did Raw Story actually republish the New York Times story, or did they write a version with a certain spin that stretche msfiddlestix Yesterday #47
Do it! sheshe2 Sunday #4
If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo Sunday #5
Mueller orangecrush Sunday #8
Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect Sunday #9
Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom Sunday #10
Ewwwww Just Jerome Sunday #20
Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs Sunday #26
Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything Sunday #11
He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker Sunday #13
The remarks were made in private? liberalla Sunday #25
A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist Sunday #27
Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard Sunday #12
It's not just popsdenver Sunday #22
Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus Sunday #14
I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie Sunday #15
He is insulated popsdenver Sunday #24
SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton Sunday #17
I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose Sunday #42
So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer Sunday #19
He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose Sunday #43
If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle Sunday #23
Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill Sunday #28
So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 Sunday #29
Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents Sunday #30
At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg Sunday #32
More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary Sunday #34
MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #38
Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #39
Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini Yesterday #46
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Private Jack Smith remark...»Reply #39