Latest Breaking News

Joinfortmill

(21,602 posts)

28. Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun May 10, 2026, 01:09 PM

Sunday

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rampartd FakeNoose calimary raging moderate

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Private Jack Smith remarks spur report he could drop 'unreleased evidence' against Trump [View all] BumRushDaShow Sunday OP

Don't tease us... Funtatlaguy Sunday #1

I Agree, Endless Teasing & Not Much Action WiVoter Sunday #18

He can't unilaterally decide to release the evidence InstantGratification Sunday #31

I believe the time is coming when an avalanche of previously withheld and/or hidden liberalla Sunday #33

I hope you're right. calimary Yesterday #45

"...material that could prove damaging to the president." J_William_Ryan Sunday #2

Why has this information NOT been released to the public already? Bluetus Sunday #6

Much of it was sealed by Judge Cannon Nt Fiendish Thingy Sunday #35

She can't seal the world. Bluetus Sunday #40

She sealed his report Fiendish Thingy Sunday #41

It might persuade some voters to vote differently in November. BadgerMom Yesterday #44

Bring it on, Jack Smith! Let's hear all of it ... unredacted FakeNoose Sunday #3

Just think. relogic Sunday #7

He needs a safety switch. multigraincracker Sunday #16

All that information popsdenver Sunday #21

Don't hold your breath, not goona happen. Btw, source is raw story. msfiddlestix Sunday #36

Not when it's published in the New York Times first ... Raw Story is reprinting the NYT story FakeNoose Sunday #37

Did Raw Story actually republish the New York Times story, or did they write a version with a certain spin that stretche msfiddlestix Yesterday #47

Do it! sheshe2 Sunday #4

If he has further evidence, he should release it. JohnnyRingo Sunday #5

Mueller orangecrush Sunday #8

Why wait????? The way to stop a predator is to strike first and hard. Ford_Prefect Sunday #9

Don't think this is the man trump wants to mess with. republianmushroom Sunday #10

Ewwwww Just Jerome Sunday #20

Why not? The old one sin't working too good: 3Hotdogs Sunday #26

Why "private" is part of the title? What am I missing? question everything Sunday #11

He is a private individual now, no longer employed by the public/government. nt SunSeeker Sunday #13

The remarks were made in private? liberalla Sunday #25

A private event. Invited guests only I would surmise. AZ8theist Sunday #27

Mr. Smith should hire bodyguards Bayard Sunday #12

It's not just popsdenver Sunday #22

Is that a bone spur report? generalbetrayus Sunday #14

I've often wondered why Trump has not had to deal with leaks Nixie Sunday #15

He is insulated popsdenver Sunday #24

SOMEONE has to have some guts and get the truth out. johnnyplankton Sunday #17

I believe that Jack Smith has the integrity to do it FakeNoose Sunday #42

So why didn't he release it before the presidential election?? mucifer Sunday #19

He would have been breaking the law FakeNoose Sunday #43

If he's prosecuted for illegally investigating trump radical noodle Sunday #23

Jack Smith has something BAD on Donald. Joinfortmill Sunday #28

So he'll drop this stuff only to help himself? johnp3907 Sunday #29

Just do it. Piecemeal it if you want but just get it out thete Deuxcents Sunday #30

At first I thought Jack Smith had enlisted in the army with the rank of Private Redleg Sunday #32

More Raw Story bullshit.... reACTIONary Sunday #34

MaddowBlog-Silent no more, Jack Smith calls out Trump's 'corrupted' Justice Department LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #38

Jack Smith Calls the Justice Dept. 'Corrupted' by Trump and His Allies (NYT gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #39

Jack Smith.... MarcoZandrini Yesterday #46