Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(171,515 posts)
18. During Raygun
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:11 PM
Saturday

a large number of so-called "Democrats" ran away from the remarkable legacy of Jimmy Carter and switched parties, leaving the party a shell of itself, essentially jettisoning the ideals of "traditional liberalism", and moving towards a more "corporate-friendly "posture.

IOW, like 2016, they fell for a washed up actor who made bold promises, while colluding with the media to kneecap an opponent.

It's been over 40 years and the original thrust of Raygun has been handily thrown under the bus and crushed (although his original personal and corporate tax breaks for the wealthy live on), and it has been a chore to pivot away from classic messaging and campaigning, to have to deal with a bunch of fucking loons, scraped from the depths of an outdoor pit latrine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought the courts decided that El Bloat-O cannot impose tariffs - only congress. Marie Marie Friday #1
shitstain could never read past 3rd grade, at most. dave99 Friday #2
Republicans have never been ones to obey the law, and Democrats very seldomly hold them accountable LiberalArkie Friday #3
"Republicans have never been ones to obey the law, and Democrats very seldomly hold them accountable" BumRushDaShow Friday #7
I wasn't really thinking of now as much as in the past LiberalArkie Saturday #14
How far "in the past"? BumRushDaShow Saturday #15
Probably at least the Reagan administration. Dismantling public health, housing. The tax cuts, the LiberalArkie Saturday #17
During Raygun BumRushDaShow Saturday #18
Can't under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) pat_k Friday #9
hes already used the thirrd one worldwide moonshinegnomie Friday #13
SCOTUS said it was unconstitutional to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs. Ms. Toad Friday #11
what trade deal did they violate and how did they violate it? ChicagoTeamster Friday #4
The marmalade shartcannon is just butthurt.... Brother Buzz Friday #5
He wanted them to lose ships, troops, and aircraft as well as lose money in the strait of Hormuz ChicagoTeamster Friday #6
Well--how can Trump acuse The European Comm. of not folling the trade deal when the USSC said no dice??? riversedge Friday #8
This! "Deal" extorted by tariff imposed illegally is void. pat_k Friday #10
Someone must have mentioned the Epstein files. n/t flvegan Friday #12
Is this another direct order from Putin? notKeith Saturday #16
He gets itchy to impose tariffs same as he gets itchy to start wars struggle4progress Saturday #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he'll place 25...»Reply #18