Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(172,540 posts)
21. You wouldn't have wanted to be at my place
Sat May 2, 2026, 11:43 AM
May 2

back in 2009 - 2010 when I was ranting and raving about the dysfunctional coverage of the ACA legislative markups and reporting.

I think at the time, there were SIX (primary) Congressional Committees (3 in each chamber), that were doing their own versions from the perspectives of the subject matter each Committee handled. Then each Committee would report out progress on what they had so far and the STUPID ASS media WENT WILD saying THIS IS "THE BILL"... and I was screaming at the TV - "NO IT IS NOT!!!!!"

Due to all those Committees and their versions, a "Joint Conference Committee" consisting of both chambers and members of both parties, had to be convened in order to combine all the versions to have ONE BILL for both chambers to vote on.

Back in 2009, Democrats actually had 60 members (including those who caucused with us like Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman as the (I)s) at the time AND after Arlen Specter switched parties from (R) to (D)) in the Senate. So what was being crafted was generally being done by Democrats and could get through cloture pretty easily with a straight vote (once the instigators like Max Baucus and Joe Lieberman were prodded).

But when Ted Kennedy passed away that summer of 2009, the (D)s would lose the 60 vote majority once he MA special election happened that late fall (won by a (R) to fill the rest of Ted's term), and so the "first part" of the ACA was passed just before the start of 2010 with the 60 Senate votes, but had to be later "revised" using "reconciliation" (like they are doing now with ICE" ), to complete what would be a "second part", where the full name of the final thing became the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act", and it was signed off on by Obama in March of 2010.

Some of my ranting and ravings from back then are probably captured in the DU2 archive, but it might be tricky to find with the search.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ICE will be funded just fine. Scrivener7 Apr 30 #1
It's still a small symbolic win and I will take it! questionseverything Apr 30 #2
Yeah, I don't think it means what you think it means. Baitball Blogger Apr 30 #3
Read post # 6 , and I did say it was symbolic questionseverything Apr 30 #8
Unless I'm filling spice jars, I never like to hear "funnel." Harker Apr 30 #9
The passed bill contains no money for ICE...the GOP got a "blueprint" for later Prairie Gates Apr 30 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author iemanja Apr 30 #18
The ICE thing was going through "reconciliation" versus "the rest of DHS" one BumRushDaShow Apr 30 #6
So if I'm reading this right.. ananda Apr 30 #17
YUP. BumRushDaShow May 1 #19
Republicans falsely blamed democrats when all Trump had to do was sign an EO. Norrrm Apr 30 #4
We slowed them down and exposed them. The public knows who is in cahoots with Trump. /nt bucolic_frolic Apr 30 #5
K & R SunSeeker Apr 30 #7
DHS should be disbanded. maxsolomon Apr 30 #10
Agreed Prairie Gates Apr 30 #14
This article was very confusngly written, imo. ShazzieB Apr 30 #11
Remember that most of the M$M is RW-owned and have intentionally tried to obfuscate what just happened BumRushDaShow Apr 30 #12
Thanks, that clarifies a lot of things. ShazzieB May 2 #20
You wouldn't have wanted to be at my place BumRushDaShow May 2 #21
Incorrect...the passed bill contains no money for ICE at all Prairie Gates Apr 30 #15
In the earlier reports BumRushDaShow Apr 30 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House relents, finally en...»Reply #21