Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Virginia High Court Weighs Legality of Congressional Map Approved Last Week
Oral arguments on Monday morning lasted about an hour. It was not clear how justices would rule.
A person votes early in the Virginia redistricting referendum at the Fairfax County Government Center in Fairfax, Va., earlier this month. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Associated Press
By Campbell Robertson
April 27, 2026
The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in a Republican challenge to a state congressional map that had been redrawn by the legislature and approved less than a week ago by voters in a statewide referendum.
The case revolves around procedural issues, some of them quite technical, but it carries national stakes, possibly including control of Congress after the midterms. At heart is an amendment, which Virginians approved by a three-point margin last Tuesday, giving the state General Assembly the power to draw a new congressional map mid-decade if other states have redistricted first. Typically, new lines are drawn after the census, every 10 years.
{snip}
The case argued on Monday before the Virginia Supreme Court came out of Tazewell County in the rural southwestern corner of the state, where Republican leaders, among other plaintiffs, challenged the amendment on procedural grounds. In January, Circuit Court Judge Jack S. Hurley, Jr., ruled in their favor, saying that the amendment was invalid and prohibiting a referendum on it. On appeal, the state Supreme Court allowed the referendum to go forward but said it would rule on the issues afterward. ... Thomas R. McCarthy, a lawyer representing those challenging the amendment, pointed out that more than a million people had voted in 2025 before the amendment was proposed. “None of these voters had any idea this was coming,” he said. “And that’s not how the process is supposed to work.”
Facing a steady barrage of questions from two of the seven justices, Matthew Seligman, arguing on behalf of the amendment, said that the word “election,” as defined in the state Constitution, clearly referred to Election Day itself, “a single day that takes place in November.” State law provides “an opportunity to participate in the election early,” he said, but that does not change when the election actually takes place. “That’s why it’s called early voting.”
{snip}
Nick Corasaniti contributed reporting.
Campbell Robertson reports for The Times on Delaware, the District of Columbia, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia.
A version of this article appears in print on April 28, 2026, Section A, Page 16 of the New York edition with the headline: Virginia Supreme Court Weighs New Election Map. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
Oral arguments on Monday morning lasted about an hour. It was not clear how justices would rule.
A person votes early in the Virginia redistricting referendum at the Fairfax County Government Center in Fairfax, Va., earlier this month. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Associated Press
By Campbell Robertson
April 27, 2026
The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in a Republican challenge to a state congressional map that had been redrawn by the legislature and approved less than a week ago by voters in a statewide referendum.
The case revolves around procedural issues, some of them quite technical, but it carries national stakes, possibly including control of Congress after the midterms. At heart is an amendment, which Virginians approved by a three-point margin last Tuesday, giving the state General Assembly the power to draw a new congressional map mid-decade if other states have redistricted first. Typically, new lines are drawn after the census, every 10 years.
{snip}
The case argued on Monday before the Virginia Supreme Court came out of Tazewell County in the rural southwestern corner of the state, where Republican leaders, among other plaintiffs, challenged the amendment on procedural grounds. In January, Circuit Court Judge Jack S. Hurley, Jr., ruled in their favor, saying that the amendment was invalid and prohibiting a referendum on it. On appeal, the state Supreme Court allowed the referendum to go forward but said it would rule on the issues afterward. ... Thomas R. McCarthy, a lawyer representing those challenging the amendment, pointed out that more than a million people had voted in 2025 before the amendment was proposed. “None of these voters had any idea this was coming,” he said. “And that’s not how the process is supposed to work.”
Facing a steady barrage of questions from two of the seven justices, Matthew Seligman, arguing on behalf of the amendment, said that the word “election,” as defined in the state Constitution, clearly referred to Election Day itself, “a single day that takes place in November.” State law provides “an opportunity to participate in the election early,” he said, but that does not change when the election actually takes place. “That’s why it’s called early voting.”
{snip}
Nick Corasaniti contributed reporting.
Campbell Robertson reports for The Times on Delaware, the District of Columbia, Kentucky, Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia.
A version of this article appears in print on April 28, 2026, Section A, Page 16 of the New York edition with the headline: Virginia Supreme Court Weighs New Election Map. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read