Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

snot

(11,848 posts)
5. The ratio of housing owned by investors out of all housing currently in existence is irrelevant;
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 07:46 PM
Monday

rather, what matters is the ratio of the total number of homes that are actually available for sale relative to the number of families that want to buy homes. Investors have tied up disproportionate chunks of the housing that would otherwise be for sale.

The biggest concern that affects both owned homes & rental units is the the fact that wage inflation has not kept up with the inflation in the costs for shelter.

Limiting the number of homes that investors can own may not fix much in the near term, but it's a step in the right direction.

As for renters, I read recently on a financial site that most cities actually have a surplus of rentals available at this point – although the article may have been focussing on apartments.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate housing bill that ...»Reply #5