Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Buddyzbuddy

(2,724 posts)

4. I also thought taxing owners of sfr's between 3-10 might make a difference.

Reply to 70sEraVet (Reply #3)

Mon Apr 13, 2026, 06:38 PM

Monday

350! That's not a restriction. That's a goal.

I also think the big investors are a major reason why homeowners insurance costs have skyrocketed. The big investors don't have to carry insurance because they can self insure. It's worth it because the risk is spread out among many properties, therefore limiting a catastrophic loss.
This in turn depletes the funds needed by insurance companies to cover losses.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70sEraVet

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate housing bill that takes aim at institutional investors may do little for homebuyers -- and could even hurt renters [View all] BumRushDaShow Monday OP

I don't see it is so much as way to "redistribute" who owns them as rental properties ToxMarz Monday #1

But not much of the country's single-family housing stock is rented out. paleotn Monday #2

I always envisioned that the solution would be placing a high tax.... 70sEraVet Monday #3

I also thought taxing owners of sfr's between 3-10 might make a difference. Buddyzbuddy Monday #4

I hadn't thought about them not bothering to carry home-owners insurance. 70sEraVet Yesterday #6

The ratio of housing owned by investors out of all housing currently in existence is irrelevant; snot Monday #5

Horse doo doo. The house flippers and corporate buyers are what sent the prices so high. travelingthrulife Yesterday #7

I'm sure that the Senators who voted for this populist rubbish already knew this Jose Garcia Yesterday #8