Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Ray Bruns

(6,456 posts)

1. "but gave the president a chance to file an amended complaint"

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Mon Apr 13, 2026, 10:01 AM

5 hrs ago

Why? Fucking why? There will be no more evidence in the future than there is now. It should have been dismissed with prejudice.
This just keeps the harassment going.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

mopinko Multichromatic dave99

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge dismisses Trump's $10B lawsuit against WSJ, Murdoch over reporting on ties to Epstein [View all] BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago OP

"but gave the president a chance to file an amended complaint" Ray Bruns 5 hrs ago #1

It's GOP infighting BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago #2

Because that is the law supported by prior court rulings melm00se 4 hrs ago #3

+1 onenote 3 hrs ago #4

MaddowBlog-Federal judge rejects Trump's dubious defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal LetMyPeopleVote 3 hrs ago #5

More flying ketchup bottles Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 1 hr ago #6