Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(7,191 posts)
16. This building has been subject to criticism since 1957.....
Sat Apr 11, 2026, 11:55 AM
12 hrs ago

.... when it was recommended that it be torn down....

Caution - AI Summary
The President’s Advisory Commission on Presidential Office Space recommended the demolition of the Old Executive Office Building, originally the State, War, and Navy Building, now the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, in 1957.

Key details regarding this recommendation (H. Doc. No. 85-211) include:

Recommendation: The 1957 report urged the demolition of the Victorian-style, granite building, then often called the "EOB" or "OEOB" and replacing it with a new structure that would be more in keeping with the character of the White House.

Context: The report was commissioned by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who viewed the building as a "monstrosity".

Outcome: The recommendation was not immediately acted upon due to growing sentiment to preserve the historic building, which ultimately saved it from destruction.

Subsequent History: Ironically, the building was later named after President Eisenhower in 2002.


I doubt TSF had anything to do with the current proposal. It's just the bureaucracy carrying on, trying to maintain an old stricture that is hard to keep up.

IMHO it should be torn down and replaced. As Eisenhower said, it is a monstrosity. Putting paint on it is not going to change that.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A distraction? Brought by his lapdog, CBS Captain Zero 19 hrs ago #1
I propose that... littlemissmartypants 18 hrs ago #2
HOW can he not have MORE IMPORTANT THINGS to be concerned with ????? eppur_se_muova 18 hrs ago #3
He is so out of his depth in foreign affairs and economic policy, all he focuses on is what he's always known... thesquanderer 13 hrs ago #13
He fancies himself an expert at renovation and design. forgotmylogin 10 hrs ago #20
He's a child. And everyone knows some_of_us_are_sane 15 hrs ago #4
EPSTEIN FILES....EPSTEIN FILES....EPSTEIN FILES....EPSTEIN FILES....EPSTEIN FILES.... Bengus81 15 hrs ago #5
Gold trim!!!! AverageOldGuy 15 hrs ago #6
And another terrible idea resurfaces... yorkster 14 hrs ago #7
Ooh! That gives me an idea how we can keep him (more) distracted. tanyev 14 hrs ago #8
It is extremely sick that our country is dying and this man is concerned with redecorating!! Hope22 14 hrs ago #9
Trump originally said he wanted to "remodel" the East wing. Multichromatic 14 hrs ago #10
The upcoming Democratic president can quickly repaint it BLUE. KY_EnviroGuy 13 hrs ago #11
Doesn't he have more important things to do radical noodle 13 hrs ago #12
If he can't paint it... COL Mustard 13 hrs ago #14
I think Rebl2 12 hrs ago #15
*decorator. eggplant 10 hrs ago #19
daycorater. tacky tacky tacky. pansypoo53219 4 hrs ago #41
This building has been subject to criticism since 1957..... reACTIONary 12 hrs ago #16
_ LudwigPastorius 11 hrs ago #18
Yeah, like, that building... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #22
Instead of wanting to destroy, renovate or paint the shit house kimbutgar 11 hrs ago #17
The proposal IS to paint it. Not destroy it.... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #21
He had mused about this last November and was sued by similar Preservationist groups suing for the ballroom BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago #24
Thanks. It looks like he is more involved .... reACTIONary 8 hrs ago #29
OT but BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago #43
Thanks for the further information... reACTIONary 54 min ago #44
Painting it will make it harder to maintain, water gets behind the paint, the stone can't breath Blues Heron 8 hrs ago #26
I don't think so. The proposal says that... reACTIONary 7 hrs ago #31
thats just bullshit, repainting that thing will have to be nearly continuous, whereas the granite is holding up fine. Blues Heron 7 hrs ago #33
Yeah, well, like, that's... reACTIONary 7 hrs ago #38
What's his cut? Icanthinkformyself 8 hrs ago #23
Could have been worse. He could have wanted it painted gold. n/t Emrys 8 hrs ago #25
;-{) White with touch of Neon Goonch 8 hrs ago #27
That's gotta be one of the least destructive ideas he's had in his second term. Unlike his other building/remodeling Fil1957 8 hrs ago #28
"You could even make an argument that it looks good." BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago #32
This is the shit he spends his time on. Joinfortmill 7 hrs ago #30
An eyesore?! It's a beautiful building! 50 Shades Of Blue 7 hrs ago #34
Yeah, Paris is full of those "old eyesores". LudwigPastorius 7 hrs ago #37
Trump Officials Sued for Plan to Repaint Eisenhower Building (1) Nov. 17, 2025, 10:01 AM CST riversedge 7 hrs ago #35
Another anti-GOP campaign ad in the making Redleg 7 hrs ago #36
That's one behemoth building. John1956PA 6 hrs ago #39
Heh dipshit painting marble and slate white will make the building disintegrate faster turbinetree 6 hrs ago #40
It is characterized as slate colored, but.... reACTIONary 49 min ago #45
MAGIC paint. usonian 4 hrs ago #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump proposes painting e...»Reply #16