Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AverageOldGuy

(3,914 posts)
2. Give the voter a printed ballot . . .
Sat Apr 4, 2026, 08:06 AM
Saturday

. . . even if it's more than one page long.

The ballot should have the questions or persons being voted on with oval/circle/rectangle/square beside the choices. Voter fills in the circle/oval/etc. with a pen that will not smear. Feed the ballot into a scanner that reads to position of the filled-in oval/circle/whatever and creates a tally from those marks.

This "mark sense" technology has been around since at least the mid-1950's when I filled in circles and squares on test answer sheets in a poor, rural Mississippi county. The technology works and is reliable.

This process -- voter marks a ballot, scanner reads the marks and produces a tally -- results in (1) fast, reliable tallies that are (2) backed up by paper ballots that can be hand-tallied.

Dump the QR codes, the barcodes, or anything else except for hand-marked, machine-tallied paper ballots.

Hand-counting (actually, hand tallying) is notoriously unreliable, requiring recount, double-check, recount, triple-check, recount . . .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Georgia lawmakers end ann...»Reply #2