Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

no_hypocrisy

(54,960 posts)

3. He won't understand any of it. Either will be posting on TS or will fall asleep.

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Apr 1, 2026, 04:53 AM

Wednesday

And I hope that Justice Brown Jackson brings up in orals a "hypothetical" question about would a boy, born to a mother, who had not realized her naturalization at the time of his birth. and his father is an American citizen, should not be recognized as an American citizen and be legally regarded than an "anchor baby". No exceptions for the fame and notoriety of his parents. And would expulsion be retroactive?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bengus81 Dixc Auggie

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump plans to attend Wednesday's Supreme Court hearing on birthright citizenship [View all] BumRushDaShow Wednesday OP

Watch his fat ass fall asleep Captain Zero Wednesday #1

Trying to work the refs. Despicable. SunSeeker Wednesday #2

He won't understand any of it. Either will be posting on TS or will fall asleep. no_hypocrisy Wednesday #3

I have a friend who was a landscape customer of mine who is a very good attorney and one of his cases he Botany Wednesday #13

Rec'd for the Bobcat mention Auggie Wednesday #15

How will the Supreme Court deal with the Secret Service demands for covering the POTUS? Tim S Wednesday #4

Not like he'll understand what's going on BaronChocula Wednesday #5

I would love to see Justice Jackson reprimand him for his awkward interruptions Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #6

Every court needs a jester C_U_L8R Wednesday #7

I am more than willing to test that hypothesis. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Wednesday #8

is he going to bring his best glower? nt Javaman Wednesday #9

He gonna lurk behind all the Supremes while they're talking? tanyev Wednesday #10

Unfortantly we won't see any video of it, correct? No cameras allowed? Bengus81 Wednesday #11

Has anyone told Chump that he won't be allowed to speak? And there will be no TV cameras? FakeNoose Wednesday #12

I hope he brings Barron, Melania's anchor baby. JohnnyRingo Wednesday #14

In the event there is NOT a Unanimous decision on the 14th Amendment,,,, ProudMNDemocrat Wednesday #16

MaddowBlog-Trump's attendance at the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship arguments won't help his case LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #17