Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court rules against Colorado ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ+ kids [View all]Prairie Gates
(8,219 posts)15. I don't know that there's a live case coming through the courts that would challenge Obergefell
Which is why I pushed the timeline out a bit.
The right has made tremendous headway over the last five years backlashing LGBTQ issues into oblivion, but I think marriage is still clinging to some support. But four years from now, if the backlash continues apace? It's going to get pulled back on a state's right basis, with the "moderate" excuse from the media and the Scott Bessents of the world that you can still get married on Massachusetts, Illinois, New York, etc,, the same way they did it with Roe.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court rules against Colorado ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ+ kids [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Tuesday
OP
I don't know that there's a live case coming through the courts that would challenge Obergefell
Prairie Gates
Tuesday
#15
I could accept this, though not like it, if this principle were being applied anything like equally
dsc
Tuesday
#3
This is an excerpt from the Kagan & Sotomayor concurring opinion. Justice Kagan authored it & Justice Sotomayor joined.
24601
Tuesday
#6
Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is "only speech" as well, but it is regulated.
SunSeeker
Tuesday
#16
WTF? It is not a Free Speech question. It is a medical, sociological, and ethical question.
Martin68
Tuesday
#10
If that is what the decision is based on, then it does seem reasonable to me. As long as advice is freely requested and
Martin68
Tuesday
#22
Many of the people undergoing conversion therapy are minors forced by their bigoted Christian parents.
Lonestarblue
Tuesday
#26
I agree entirely. My point is if the subject request advice, that is legit. Does the court finding allow parents to
Martin68
Tuesday
#31
Abuse because of a child's gender identity or sexual orientation certainly isn't a domain exclusive to Christianity.
24601
Tuesday
#32
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
#27
Deadline Legal Blog-Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson steps out alone, again - this time on 'conversion therapy'
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
#28