Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(170,007 posts)
Sun Mar 29, 2026, 08:44 AM Mar 29

Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship threatens 'chaos' in proving newborns' status [View all]

Source: CNN Politics

PUBLISHED Mar 29, 2026, 4:00 AM ET


Justice Brett Kavanaugh sounded like a fired-up prosecutor last year as he shot off a withering series of nuts-and-bolts questions about how President Donald Trump would carry out his plan to rewrite of the way birthright citizenship has been understood in the United States for more than a century.

Would hospitals have to change the way they process newborns? Kavanaugh demanded. Would state governments have to do something different? How would federal officials determine citizenship if a birth certificate no longer sufficed? “Federal officials will have to figure that out essentially,” US Solicitor General D. John Sauer managed to say amid a fusillade of rapid-fire queries. “How?” Kavanaugh pressed. “So, you can imagine a number of ways —” Sauer began. “Such as?” Kavanaugh interjected.

As the Supreme Court prepares to consider the merits of Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship on Wednesday, most of the same practical questions Kavanaugh raised a year ago remain unanswered. Some of those questions speak to the bureaucratic nightmare that Americans — including US citizens — might face documenting a child’s immigration status. Others go to the very heart of what it means to be a US citizen.

Most of the court’s arguments this week will deal with the history of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause, which makes clear that “all persons born” in the United States who are “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/29/politics/trump-birthright-case-us-citizen

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We do not have the "best and the brightest" on our SCOTUS. MLWR Mar 29 #1
Yeah. Unfortunately... GB_RN Mar 29 #2
They're trying to enable the crafting of arguments to back up Trump's request. ChicagoTeamster Mar 29 #4
I know this is simplistic but we are all birthright citizens Srkdqltr Mar 29 #3
Insanity. This is settled law, even written into our Constitution specifically as an Amendment. Midnight Writer Mar 29 #5
Excellent comment! WestMichRad Mar 29 #9
It makes me wonder what is Kavanaugh's real position on this issue? FakeNoose Mar 29 #6
Damn, that's foul cause Dan Mar 29 #15
Yes, those are called "anchor babies" and it has been going on for a long time FakeNoose Monday #36
I didn't know he asked those questions. It's good that he asked them. LeftInTX Mar 29 #17
The Confederacy renounced their US citizenship by seceding. All of their descendants lost their birthright citizenship ChicagoTeamster Mar 29 #7
PLEASE, PLEASE Understand what EOs are and what they are not Bluetus Mar 29 #8
That is how it is SUPPOSED to work BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #11
We have to make it more difficult for Roberts Bluetus Mar 29 #14
We went through that exercise his first term BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #20
I am perfectly aware we don't control the GOP, the SCOTUS or the legacy media Bluetus Mar 29 #25
"It is crazy to just sit back and accept this. WE must do our part." BumRushDaShow Monday #30
Going down a rabbit hole, I also saw this: LeftInTX Mar 29 #19
The below is the argument they are apparently going to try to use - BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #21
They used that arguement last year LeftInTX Mar 29 #22
As long as the SCOTUS keeps refusing stays on the illegal E.O.s BumRushDaShow Mar 29 #24
Has the SCOTUS allowed any of the bogus EOs to stand permanently? Bluetus Mar 29 #26
Remember that we are ONLY just over a year into this term BumRushDaShow Monday #31
I'm sure the SCOTUS is all about helping Trump with his agenda Bluetus Monday #32
I agree with what you wrote and in particular BumRushDaShow Monday #33
Considering that 2700 pages is just a little more than 5 reams of papper. Bluetus Monday #35
I seriously doubt, Bayard Mar 29 #10
"Or any other white baby" .... Would Trump /Roberts bring back the 'one drop' rule of race determination? Norrrm Mar 29 #27
Easy peasy WestMichRad Mar 29 #28
If birthright citizenship is dropped Old Crank Mar 29 #12
As is plainly clear, "What then ?" is not a familiar question to this WH. Shoot first, ask questions later, think never. eppur_se_muova Mar 29 #13
Donald should prove that he is serious - and there is a way Dan Mar 29 #16
The Supreme Court fight does not threaten chaos. The administration's suit threatens chaos. Martin68 Mar 29 #18
Bureaucratic nightmare Mz Pip Mar 29 #23
Trump's perfect judge... Roland Freisler... original citizenship could be revoked Norrrm Mar 29 #29
'Alarm bells' ring as Trump resurrects racist arguments in major legal case: experts LetMyPeopleVote Monday #34
The man behind Donald Trump's push to end birthright citizenship (suspended attorney John Eastman) LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #37
Former Trump lawyer John Eastman arriving at the Supreme Court for the birthright citizenship debate. LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #38
Can't wait for him to be disbarred! BumRushDaShow Thursday #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court fight over ...