Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Grins

(9,499 posts)
10. ""The law serves no educational purpose, AS THE STATE ADMITS..."
Wed Mar 18, 2026, 11:09 AM
Mar 18

And there it is! The law was political. Aimed at keeping the prejudices of constituents.

Further, the state was was not the defendant in this case, it was an intervenor.* And just as bad,

Jeff LeMaster, Griffin’s communications director, said the office was “reviewing the opinion and will appeal.”

You haven't completed a review but announced you will appeal? Again proving the case was political.

The decision: https://www.au.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Summary-Judgment-Stinson-v.-Fayetteville-SD-No.-1-3.16.26.pdf

* Intervenor: A third party not in the lawsuit who voluntarily enters a legal proceeding because it has a personal stake or significant interest in the outcome.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Arkansas school districts...»Reply #10