Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

thesquanderer

(12,971 posts)

21. re: "These are things that have affected HIM (i.e., most particularly the tariffs loss), yet they are still there"

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 7, 2026, 03:16 PM

5 hrs ago

Trump personally advocated for tariffs. His ire about their being struck down is targeted at the supreme court justices who struck them down, not the advisors who were in sync with what he wanted them to say and do. That is nothing like Noem claiming that Trump personally approved her self-promoting expenditures.

As an aside, striking them down is not costing Trump (personally) "hundreds of billions of ill-begotten games." That money did not going into his pocket, nor will any refunds come out of his pocket. The amount of money the decision personally cost hm is zero.

No piece de resistance there to my mind!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fed-up Republicans may soon 'punish' another Trump Cabinet member: report [View all] BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago OP

Yep. Meanwhile Patel parties on. Raven123 16 hrs ago #1

and Kegseth Skittles 15 hrs ago #2

a.k.a. Pete Hogshit peppertree 4 hrs ago #23

Bondi is tricky PuraVidaDreamin 15 hrs ago #3

Since she has already been confirmed BumRushDaShow 11 hrs ago #8

Ambassador, perhaps? Argentine right-wingers like her (particularly those of Italian descent) peppertree 4 hrs ago #25

Do they get a nice severance pay when they are fired? IcyPeas 14 hrs ago #4

Not if fired for cause. Old Crank 9 hrs ago #16

Impeach Chump ... and get them ALL OUT ... make it a full sweep FakeNoose 12 hrs ago #5

MAGA's male cabinet secretaries need to go too IronLionZion 12 hrs ago #6

Handling of Epstein files? That's not a bug, Republicans. That's a "feature". paleotn 12 hrs ago #7

I don't see a male/female difference here. thesquanderer 11 hrs ago #9

No "difference" in their BEHAVIOR in their jobs BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #11

I was indeed talking about how Trump handles them. I think he is an equal opportunity dismisser. thesquanderer 9 hrs ago #12

"You describe his actions as "almost" as egregious (so, not quite as much)" BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago #14

I'm not saying Trump isn't a misogynist, but I just don't think it's very relevant in this case. thesquanderer 8 hrs ago #19

As I wrote further downthread BumRushDaShow 7 hrs ago #20

re: "These are things that have affected HIM (i.e., most particularly the tariffs loss), yet they are still there" thesquanderer 5 hrs ago #21

"Trump personally advocated for tariffs." BumRushDaShow 4 hrs ago #22

Sadly nwduke 11 hrs ago #10

It is not really "female purge." We do not run a country by former beauty queens. question everything 9 hrs ago #13

45 likes his "trophy" (fill in blank - wives, agency heads, etc) BumRushDaShow 9 hrs ago #15

"All the best people." SergeStorms 8 hrs ago #17

Get rid of the women. Keep the men. yardwork 8 hrs ago #18

President Obama looked for competence in his female appointments; Trump looks for blond hair and a worshipping artemisia1 4 hrs ago #24