Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pnwmom

(110,297 posts)
Fri Feb 27, 2026, 03:05 AM Feb 27

Epstein files contain explicit but unsubstantiated claim that Trump abused minor [View all]

Source: The Guardian

Three memos that describe four interviews conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2019 contain explicit but unsubstantiated claims that Donald Trump sexually abused a woman when she was a minor in the early 1980s with the assistance of Jeffrey Epstein, according to a Guardian review of those documents.

The Department of Justice did not release those records when it uploaded millions of pages of files related to Epstein beginning in December. The existence of the missing documents was first reported by independent journalist Roger Sollenberger and subsequently confirmed by NPR, causing outrage in Washington and sparking an investigation from congressional Democrats.

The Guardian obtained the missing FBI form 302 reports, which memorialize 25 pages of agents’ notes from the four interviews conducted in the summer and fall of 2019. The notes describe how the woman came forward to tell agents she recognized Epstein from a photo sent by a childhood friend. Only the first session, in which she did not name Trump, made it into the public release. The Guardian has chosen not to publish the woman’s name.

Her allegations have not been verified, and the FBI never brought charges related to her claims, which at times appear outlandish. Her statements also contradict what is known about Epstein’s life in the early 1980s. The millions of investigative documents released by the DoJ have contained explosive allegations that have led to resignations and arrests, but also specious claims that have later proven false. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing related to Epstein, and said last week: “I did nothing.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/trump-epstein-files-fbi



The big news is that the UK's The Guardian has actually "obtained" and "reviewed" the missing FBI reports.

The Guardian reports that "at times" the claims "appear outlandish" -- and "contradict what is known about Epstein’s life in the early 1980s." How much longer can Trump prevent the reports from being made available to the public?
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A witness statement IS substantiation. Why is it so "outlandlish" to believe pedophiles would do this? SunSeeker Feb 27 #1
If you read Sollenberger's article, it is suggested that this victim is the same one mentioned here AZJonnie Feb 27 #6
What parent let's a 13 year old fly off wnylib Feb 27 #21
Agree, and at the very least, the 'multiple times' makes me really question it AZJonnie Feb 27 #25
If we had all the details from that girl's statements wnylib Feb 27 #31
The UK Guardian has the interviews. When their tone is like it is in this article AZJonnie Feb 28 #33
No need to explain the Guardian's political slant to me. wnylib Feb 28 #34
We do need to see them, on this point we agree AZJonnie Feb 28 #35
More media bullshit ("substantiation") Bluetus Feb 27 #22
We're talking about a guy who's daughter barely escaped his predation Xipe Totec Feb 27 #2
based on the lengths Trump is going to, to distract from these files Skittles Feb 27 #3
Funny, you don't hear him complaining about "Epstein Epstein Epstein" BWdem4life Feb 27 #4
If you read the whole article, the claims unfortunately do sound a bit sketchy AZJonnie Feb 27 #5
the article does paint her as very sketchy, with some criminal activity in recent years LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #10
It's confusing because the Guardian article suggests she dropped the suit AZJonnie Feb 27 #24
Good point. I think there is a lot of conflicitng info on this person, perhaps put out intentionally, perhaps because LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #30
Roll the snuff films Whip-poor-will Feb 27 #7
Welcome to DU ! KS Toronado Feb 27 #13
Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Feb 27 #28
Even the "appearence of an impropriety" is bad enough. Hieronymus Phact Feb 27 #8
there were 4 minors who accused the orange pedo. Javaman Feb 27 #9
and The Guardian is saying they've seen these 3 transcripts or notes and they are not as damning as we might like LymphocyteLover Feb 27 #11
I wonder if this was the young woman who settled a claim with the Epstein estate. As I recall, there Vinca Feb 27 #12
Have the DOJ or the Republicans who control congress even tried to contact this person everyonematters Feb 27 #14
"Unsubstantiated claims"? Has The Guardian Never Heard Of "Circumstantial ColoringFool Feb 27 #15
Odd how the victim's name was published. Kid Berwyn Feb 27 #16
So the White House's fall back position is going to be this is really just unsubstantiated allegations? Botany Feb 27 #17
It's a crime to file a false FBI report. Six117 Feb 27 #18
So she had a small criminal history so the victim deniers are out in force. travelingthrulife Feb 27 #19
If there is ONE there is a bluestarone Feb 27 #20
interview the survivors azureblue Feb 27 #23
Don't want to beat up . . . Scubamatt Feb 27 #26
I'd like to ask people who consider the claims BlueKota Feb 27 #27
Notice he hasn't sued anyone who has made these claims yet. ificandream Feb 27 #29
DISCOVERY Bluetus Feb 27 #32
Kick ck4829 Mar 2 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Epstein files contain exp...