Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(168,623 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2026, 05:00 PM Feb 24

Supreme Court rules the Postal Service can't be sued, even when mail is intentionally not delivered [View all]

Source: AP

Updated 12:56 PM EST, February 24, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Americans can’t sue the U.S. Postal Service, even when employees deliberately refuse to deliver mail.

By a 5-4 vote, the justices ruled against a Texas landlord, Lebene Konan, who alleges her mail was intentionally withheld for two years. Konan, who is Black, claims racial prejudice played a role in postal employees’ actions.

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for a majority of five conservative justices, said the federal law that generally shields the Postal Service from lawsuits over missing, lost and undelivered mail includes “the intentional nondelivery of mail.”

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that while the protection against lawsuits is broad, it does not extend to situations when the decision not to deliver mail “was driven by malicious reasons.” Justice Neil Gorsuch joined his three liberal colleagues in dissent.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-postal-service-missing-mail-7ce97a5b7d56373cdeaa6ecc9a9132f5



Link to RULING (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-351_7648.pdf
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
. dalton99a Feb 24 #1
Bizarre and awful wolfie001 Feb 24 #6
Absolutely! Failure to deliver services has gone off the deep end. slightlv Feb 24 #14
Wrong sexual preference? No marriage license for you! Seinan Sensei Feb 25 #19
Newman says... Be The Light Feb 24 #18
Evil, unconstitutional decision. What about our mailed ballots? SunSeeker Feb 24 #2
Legal Cover For Intentional Non-delivery Of Ballots 2na fisherman Feb 24 #12
Instead of civil relief, can she/we pursue criminal charges? SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 25 #20
Theft Of The Mail 2na fisherman Feb 25 #25
First step towards mail-in vote fraud synni Feb 24 #3
Why does everyone have qualified immunity except me? catrose Feb 24 #4
I thought it was always like that. A government operation can not be sued unless the organization agrees to it. LiberalArkie Feb 24 #5
there was a spate of fires in collection boxes a few yrs ago mopinko Feb 24 #9
Be ready folks. coming decisions from THIS supreme court will bluestarone Feb 24 #7
Non Delivery of mail maliaSmith Feb 24 #8
In my state we have ballot drop boxes in addition to the US mail Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Feb 24 #13
Same, and it's impossible to tell how you voted Qutzupalotl Feb 25 #27
... progressoid Feb 24 #10
Epstein rules. ananda Feb 24 #11
Oh, how I hope we completely overwhelm them! slightlv Feb 24 #15
The law always makes exceptions for malicious reasons. Baitball Blogger Feb 24 #16
Thomas is Americas Uncle Tom. BradBo Feb 24 #17
Mail sabotage due to political party will be a given Blue Dotty Feb 25 #21
Just another reason to vote in person, if you can. COL Mustard Feb 25 #22
IMHO, Thomas is an irrelevant potted plant BumRushDaShow Feb 25 #23
We are witnessing a supreme court that whole goal is bluestarone Feb 25 #24
Justice Clarence Thomas rules racism and discrimination against black people is ok!!! Multichromatic Feb 25 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules the P...