Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,589 posts)
15. Let the lawsuits begin
Mon Feb 23, 2026, 09:13 PM
Yesterday

The bigger the mess, the better.

I don't much care how the earlier tariffs are refunded as long as they are shoved up Trump's ass, metaphorically speaking.

The big issue is making sure this screws up Trump's next wave of tariffs made under the 1974 law. There will be lawsuits seeing injunctions. When considering injunctive relief, the court must consider who is likely to prevail, and who is injured if the injunction is granted or not granted. Last week's SCOTUS ruling makes it very likely that Trump would lose again. And if there is great chaos in doing these refunds, that becomes a strong reason to grant the injunction. In other words, "The count has determined that it is likely the plaintiffs will prevail, and if the court allowed the tariffs to proceed, this would present a major hardship on the plaintiffs who would then have to seek refunds. And we can see this is a very painful, chaotic process. On the other hand, if the court grants the injunction while hearing the merits of the case on an expedited basis, the government is not harmed at all unless they can demonstrate the new tariffs are legal under their new theory."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When we absolutely positively have to have it back /nt bucolic_frolic Yesterday #1
Pamela Jo is going to be busy. underpants Yesterday #2
Love it. efhmc Yesterday #3
After which they'll refund consumers for any costs they passed on BWdem4life Yesterday #4
Well they should because in most cases FedEx didn't pay the tariffs, their customers did VMA131Marine Yesterday #9
Let the lawsuits begin Bluetus Yesterday #15
I think we should demand consumer refunds, ala Gov Pritzker delisen Yesterday #5
I so agree with you, delisen! slightlv Yesterday #13
they deliver twodogsbarking Yesterday #6
Why would FedEx pay tariffs, importers pay them on the goods not the shipping. ToxMarz Yesterday #7
Unless Fedex is receiving the goods at port of entry and have to make the payments then. erronis Yesterday #8
When the tariffs aren't pre-paid by the shipper ... VMA131Marine Yesterday #10
I finally found a link to the suit and added to the OP - BumRushDaShow Yesterday #12
Found a long (AI) answer ToxMarz Yesterday #16
If FedEx doesn't pass the refunds back to the recipient VMA131Marine 23 hrs ago #18
No, not at all. VMA131Marine 23 hrs ago #17
What I posted was referenced directly from the lawsuit BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #19
They may have standing to sue as the importer of record VMA131Marine 10 hrs ago #21
We are about to find out BumRushDaShow 10 hrs ago #22
Imagine how confused the average thumb-sucking RWNJ will be when they hear about this case AZJonnie Yesterday #11
I want my share! BadgerMom Yesterday #14
One of their CEOs was rabidly pro-tRUMP wolfie001 16 hrs ago #20
Neal Katyal-Tariffs were illegal. Now Trump wants to delay refunds. (gift link) LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #23
Trump Faces Tough Legal Landscape to Oppose Tariff Refunds LetMyPeopleVote 4 hrs ago #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FedEx sues for refund of ...»Reply #15