Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Bobstandard

(2,204 posts)

5. Isn't taking down the db a win for DOJ?

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Feb 4, 2026, 01:11 PM

Yesterday

The db disappears for some unknown time. Then it reappears more heavily redacted than ever. Seems like a win to me.

I bet they treat Trump asa victim a redact the 4,000+ mentions of his name.

And i bet they still don’t redact all the real victims names.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ, Epstein victims reach deal to protect identities [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

Clearly they put a higher priority on protecting the villains than then victims.... unblock Yesterday #1

That's totally disgusting, exposing them to all the maga weirdos and other predators. Dave Bowman Yesterday #2

Victims shouldn't have to play, Let's Make A Deal Bayard Yesterday #3

Yes, the DOJ's word is golden. Sneederbunk Yesterday #4

Isn't taking down the db a win for DOJ? Bobstandard Yesterday #5

I would bet leaking the names was intentional.. Chakaconcarne 22 hrs ago #10

How? Go back in time? The magat thugs know whom to harrass. GreenWave 23 hrs ago #6

Excuse me, do they BELIEVE the DOJ will act legally? Miguelito Loveless 23 hrs ago #7

Who will make DOJ unredact all the stuff they've produced that isn't supposed to be redacted -- by law??? ultralite001 23 hrs ago #8

Ever since they started these releases the past year BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago #9