Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,697 posts)
3. Starmer has already said he won't suggest that, because it's not "pragmatic" or "in the national interest"
Mon Jan 19, 2026, 09:02 AM
Monday

"I'm focused on the pragmatic response here, not the suggestion of others, and my focus is what's in the national interest for our country, what is going to best protect workers, families, businesses."

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220949720#post3

He didn't, in the entire press conference, actually say there was anything he would do, apart from talk.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lest you forget. It is 2025 and there are still kings. Lunacy. twodogsbarking Monday #1
God how some love their royals!😵‍💫 Floyd R. Turbo Monday #4
We don't love ours.... Blumancru Tuesday #18
👍🏻 Floyd R. Turbo Tuesday #19
Show Kings that were neutered from being authoritarian hundreds of years ago Bengus81 Monday #5
We Have The Rockettes twodogsbarking Monday #7
2026 even. progressoid Monday #8
Got me. The first time I wrote the new year I put down 2036. It's Wednesday and I don't know what the hell is going on. twodogsbarking Monday #9
... Wednesdays Monday #15
Heck, I have to check my phone calendar every day to see what's going on. progressoid Monday #17
According to some Brits, the royals are a revenue + operation. paleotn Monday #13
It is, however, a long time since a British head of state threatened to attack allies for their own gratification muriel_volestrangler Monday #16
It will be interesting to see if a "King" Miguelito Loveless Monday #2
Real king shouldn't even think of it. paleotn Monday #11
Starmer has already said he won't suggest that, because it's not "pragmatic" or "in the national interest" muriel_volestrangler Monday #3
It ultimately may be up to the king to decide. mwmisses4289 Monday #6
Yeah, I had been thinking he could use that as an excuse muriel_volestrangler Monday #14
Starmer, it's going to get bad for the UK's national interests no matter what you do, paleotn Monday #12
Charles looks extremely annoying. twodogsbarking Monday #10
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Calls for King Charles to...»Reply #3