Latest Breaking News

lonely bird

(2,660 posts)

37. Imo, fwiw, which is nothing...

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Original post)

Sat Dec 6, 2025, 11:21 AM

Saturday

They will strike it down. This SCOTUS, and, indeed, many SCOTUS decisions are the personal beliefs of the justices.

So…

They will claim that the language only applied to the children of slaves/former slaves and nobody else. They will uphold the citizenship of those who were made citizens under the amendment prior to their decision because it would be a nightmare otherwise.

The flexibility of the the belief structures of the conservatives can be seen particularly in the second amendment case which affirmed blanket ownership of weaponry outside of the militia wording that was plainly and openly in the amendment as a criteria for owning arms.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

HarryM GrapesOfWrath

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Friday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Friday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Friday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Friday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde Friday #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 Friday #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Friday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Friday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Friday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Friday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Friday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja Friday #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler Friday #17

You're probably right. iemanja Friday #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Friday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Friday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Friday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote Friday #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker Friday #29

You are mistaken. onenote Friday #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker Saturday #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote Saturday #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker Saturday #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote Saturday #38

You started this be saying no dissents were noted. What was your point other than to suggest they flipped? SunSeeker Sunday #39

My point was to make clear no one had noted a dissent. Nothing more or less. onenote Sunday #40

So you just made a pointless post. Got it. nt SunSeeker Sunday #41

And you stand by your lie about when cert was granted. Got it. nt onenote Sunday #43

I didn't lie about when cert was granted. I'm not the one telling lies here. nt SunSeeker 11 hrs ago #44

Yeah you did. onenote 8 hrs ago #45

No I didn't. As I said, the prior ruling, with 3 dissents, involved the exact same Executive Order. SunSeeker 5 hrs ago #46

You said certiorari had been granted. It hadn't and you have to know that by now. Not even the same case. onenote 2 hrs ago #47

john brown's body struggle4progress Friday #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress Friday #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress Friday #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress Friday #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick Friday #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF Friday #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree Friday #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker Friday #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins Friday #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 Friday #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack Friday #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer Saturday #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE Friday #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird Saturday #37

These people are partisan political operatives... RetiredParatrooper Sunday #42