Latest Breaking News

SunSeeker

(57,381 posts)

29. SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals).

Reply to onenote (Reply #15)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:59 PM

21 hrs ago

Today (Dec 5, 2025) likely involves procedural steps or appeals related to the implementation of the June ruling, not a new decision to hear the main case itself. The lack of a new order today means the status quo from the June decision prevails.

It is utterly inappropriate to suggest the 3 liberal justices want to give up birthright citizenship.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler Yesterday OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Yesterday #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Yesterday #2

You're exactly right. PSPS Yesterday #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde Yesterday #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 23 hrs ago #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Yesterday #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Yesterday #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Yesterday #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Yesterday #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja Yesterday #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #9

I didn't mean now iemanja Yesterday #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #17

You're probably right. iemanja Yesterday #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking Yesterday #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote Yesterday #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker 21 hrs ago #29

You are mistaken. onenote 18 hrs ago #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote 17 hrs ago #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker 17 hrs ago #36

Wow. Just wow. onenote 6 hrs ago #38

john brown's body struggle4progress Yesterday #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress Yesterday #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress Yesterday #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress Yesterday #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick 23 hrs ago #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF 23 hrs ago #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree 23 hrs ago #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker 23 hrs ago #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins 22 hrs ago #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 22 hrs ago #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack 20 hrs ago #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer 17 hrs ago #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE 19 hrs ago #31

Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird 7 hrs ago #37