Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

johnnyfins

(3,326 posts)

27. They took this case in order to overturn the law.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Original post)

Fri Dec 5, 2025, 08:05 PM

7 hrs ago

Plain and simple.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SunSeeker Boomerproud NotHardly

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship [View all] muriel_volestrangler 13 hrs ago OP

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque 13 hrs ago #1

Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 13 hrs ago #2

You're exactly right. PSPS 12 hrs ago #7

13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde 11 hrs ago #13

He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 8 hrs ago #25

'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R 13 hrs ago #3

This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge 13 hrs ago #4

They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone 13 hrs ago #5

Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm 13 hrs ago #6

I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja 12 hrs ago #8

Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler 12 hrs ago #9

I didn't mean now iemanja 10 hrs ago #14

Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler 10 hrs ago #17

You're probably right. iemanja 9 hrs ago #21

Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #11

Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking 12 hrs ago #10

Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler 12 hrs ago #12

No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote 10 hrs ago #15

SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker 7 hrs ago #29

You are mistaken. onenote 4 hrs ago #32

It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker 3 hrs ago #33

I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote 3 hrs ago #35

Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker 2 hrs ago #36

john brown's body struggle4progress 10 hrs ago #16

Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress 10 hrs ago #18

Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress 10 hrs ago #19

Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress 10 hrs ago #20

This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick 9 hrs ago #22

Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF 8 hrs ago #23

While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree 8 hrs ago #24

Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker 8 hrs ago #26

They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins 7 hrs ago #27

It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 7 hrs ago #28

Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack 5 hrs ago #30

Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer 3 hrs ago #34

Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE 4 hrs ago #31