Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestarone

(20,940 posts)
5. They are making their move to completely take over our laws
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 03:00 PM
Yesterday

Before our election. They are almost in control.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SCOTUS Sycophant Six plan to tamper with birthright citizenship, otherwise dobleremolque Yesterday #1
Pretty sure we all know the answer Endlessmike56 Yesterday #2
You're exactly right. PSPS 23 hrs ago #7
13th, 14th and 15th are invalid? Retrograde 22 hrs ago #13
He'll cite another 17th century Brit jurist wolfie001 20 hrs ago #25
'Executive Orders as Lawmaking' needs to end C_U_L8R Yesterday #3
This court, this regime 31st Street Bridge Yesterday #4
They are making their move to completely take over our laws bluestarone Yesterday #5
Precedence... Republicans say that Hitler did some good things. Norrrm Yesterday #6
I have to believe they will rule against Trump iemanja 23 hrs ago #8
Impeaching them would just have the Republicans blocking it (nt) muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #9
I didn't mean now iemanja 22 hrs ago #14
Impeachment needs two thirds in the Senate muriel_volestrangler 21 hrs ago #17
You're probably right. iemanja 21 hrs ago #21
Such a ruling would instantly make the court powerless and irrelevant Fiendish Thingy 23 hrs ago #11
Has a transition team been assigned for when he, well, you know, croaks. twodogsbarking 23 hrs ago #10
Roughly like this? muriel_volestrangler 23 hrs ago #12
No dissents to the grant of certiorari were noted. onenote 21 hrs ago #15
SCOTUS already granted certiorari months ago for the injunction issue (with vociferous dissents from the 3 liberals). SunSeeker 18 hrs ago #29
You are mistaken. onenote 15 hrs ago #32
It is you who is mistaken. There is absolutely no basis to suggest that Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have flipped. SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #33
I'm absolutely, positively not wrong. onenote 14 hrs ago #35
Sotomayor, Jackson and Kagan have not flipped. You are dead wrong in suggesting they did. nt SunSeeker 14 hrs ago #36
Wow. Just wow. onenote 3 hrs ago #38
john brown's body struggle4progress 21 hrs ago #16
Battle Cry of Freedom struggle4progress 21 hrs ago #18
Marching Through Georgia struggle4progress 21 hrs ago #19
Nazi Punks Fuck Off struggle4progress 21 hrs ago #20
This is the litmus test case I have been fearing. TomSlick 20 hrs ago #22
Originalists, my ass! WTF is there to decide? OMGWTF 20 hrs ago #23
While they are at it just give him immunity..............oh yeah the 6 maga POS already did that........... turbinetree 20 hrs ago #24
Absolutely disgusting. There is no reason to take up Trump's patently ridiculous argument. SunSeeker 20 hrs ago #26
They took this case in order to overturn the law. johnnyfins 19 hrs ago #27
It just takes four to agree to take a case Dangling0826 19 hrs ago #28
Asking seriously: which is easier... Shipwack 17 hrs ago #30
Expansion is by simple Congressional legislation. Blasphemer 14 hrs ago #34
Practical Aspect Considerations DallasNE 16 hrs ago #31
Imo, fwiw, which is nothing... lonely bird 4 hrs ago #37
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court agrees to d...»Reply #5