Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(68,431 posts)
2. Read 'em and weep.
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 02:29 PM
Apr 2025
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25894225-dhs-documents-mahmoud-khalil/#document/p1

Under INA section 237(a)(4)(C)(ii), for cases in which the basis for this determination is the alien's past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations that are otherwise lawful, the Secretary of State must personally determine that the alien's presence or activities would compromise a compelling U.S. foreign policy interest.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Seriously? cachukis Apr 2025 #1
Read 'em and weep. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2025 #2
Translation: "Due process? We don't need no stinkin' due process!" ShazzieB Apr 2025 #6
"...basis for this determination is the alien's past, current, or expected beliefs, statements, or associations..." erronis Apr 2025 #9
Yep, that leapt out to me as well. progressoid Apr 2025 #10
sane here gopiscrap Apr 2025 #41
Obviously, if "beliefs" (including "expected" ones)... regnaD kciN Apr 2025 #29
Did not know. Thanks. cachukis Apr 2025 #15
Expected beliefs that compromise US Foreign Policy? Thunderbeast Apr 2025 #28
Yeah but how does 1 student protesting compromise US foreign policy? Do the nazis marching around yelling Jews will tulipsandroses Apr 2025 #31
Guess I have to read that section. cachukis Apr 2025 #34
In that case, maybe the court should subpoena LilMarco to testify, Volaris Apr 2025 #47
I'm with you. Seriously! Why do I think the judge is going to call bull shit on Rubio's pernouncement? flashman13 Apr 2025 #27
All persons have rights under the First Amendment LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #3
1st Amendment rights are a gray area... Shipwack Apr 2025 #5
That's fucking asinine Orrex Apr 2025 #24
Oh lonely bird Apr 2025 #21
Rich. cachukis Apr 2025 #33
Anyone espousing that belief belongs in lockup. dchill Apr 2025 #4
Tyranny Iamscrewed Apr 2025 #8
Please clarify iemanja Apr 2025 #23
"...government cites its power to deport people for beliefs..." dchill Apr 2025 #36
Dupe. dchill Apr 2025 #37
These guys are beginning to sound more and more like Figarosmom Apr 2025 #7
They care about anti-semitism like they care about Pinback Apr 2025 #32
Its an excuse to curtail Figarosmom Apr 2025 #35
This, from an administration full of Jew hating white nationalists & a president who dines with neo-Nazis! tableturner Apr 2025 #11
It's all a head fake. erronis Apr 2025 #14
Yep. It's like the fox guarding the hen house. GreenWave Apr 2025 #26
This is what I've asking about. It appears that you can be expelled maxsolomon Apr 2025 #12
Thoughtcrime? Doubleplusungood. nt Buns_of_Fire Apr 2025 #13
Thought crime like in believing in Democracy? LiberalArkie Apr 2025 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Daleuhlmann Apr 2025 #16
The President seems to have judicial immunity... SomewhereInTheMiddle Apr 2025 #46
Protesting Human Rights abuses is not antisemitic neohippie Apr 2025 #17
we're circling the drain. barbtries Apr 2025 #18
Indefinite detention is NOT deportation/ expulsion!! SSJVegeta Apr 2025 #19
What to you think they are trying to do? iemanja Apr 2025 #25
I think the admin is trying to hold him indefinitely SSJVegeta Apr 2025 #39
Think what you like iemanja Apr 2025 #40
They called the kidnappings to el salvador "deportations" too SSJVegeta Apr 2025 #43
Protecting Jewish students... from harassment and violence in the United States... BurnDoubt Apr 2025 #20
Just when you think... GiqueCee Apr 2025 #30
I guess this means Trump will be deporting those who chanted "Jews will not replace us" in Charlottesville, yes? Solly Mack Apr 2025 #38
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights applies to "the people", not to "citizens". LudwigPastorius Apr 2025 #42
They just make this shit up, BidenRocks Apr 2025 #44
That is a very weak argument, based on what foreign policy? tornado34jh Apr 2025 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pressed for evidence agai...»Reply #2