Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,836 posts)
3. What they have been doing (for "financial" bills that MUST "originate in the House" )
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 03:44 AM
Apr 2025

is to have the House pass something and then the Senate will look at that, pass their own version (that can make it past cloture), and then the Senate will take their version, and attach it as "an Amendment as a Substitute" to some related House bill that they had that was already passed, will vote on that, and then send it back to the House for debate and vote. The House would often be "whipped" into voting for that version.

Otherwise they haven't even gotten to the point of passing any versions in either chamber without "informal" conferences between chambers for these big bills. I expect I missed some but I think the last time I monitored a Joint Conference Committee was back in 2009 when they were working on the ACA. There were something like 6 subject-matter Committees between the 2 chambers working on parts of that, where the drafts from each Committee were flying (and the media was falsely calling each of those drafts - "the bill" as if they were the "final" version - it drove me absolutely NUTS ). Eventually they needed to pull all the drafts together into a single bill and that needed the Joint Conference Committee.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Johnson punts on key budg...»Reply #3