Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Alabama

keithbvadu2

(40,915 posts)

1. "because state law didn't specifically allow for"

Reply to TexasTowelie (Original post)

Mon Mar 22, 2021, 09:45 AM

Mar 2021

When arguing the constitution on social media:

1. Whatever is not specifically allowed must be forbidden. If this logic supports your premise.

2. Whatever is not specifically forbidden must be allowed. If this logic supports your premise.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Alabama House passes ban on curbside voting [View all] TexasTowelie Mar 2021 OP

"because state law didn't specifically allow for" keithbvadu2 Mar 2021 #1