General Discussion

QueerDuck

(2,518 posts)

10. Yes, he's dead. I already addressed that. The consequences of his actions did not die with him.

Sun Jul 12, 2026, 02:03 PM

Yesterday

Reputation is for the dead, but consequences are for the living.

Lindsey Graham's death did not magically repeal his voting record. It didn't remove the lifetime-appointed judges he confirmed, and it didn't undo the decades of systemic barriers he helped reinforce against LGBTQ equality.

This goes far beyond a philosophical debate over a dead man's "reputation." I am one of the living, and his legislative legacy actively affects my life, my safety, and my rights today.

We don't analyze his history to change his past... we analyze it because we still have to survive the real-world fallout of his choices in our present.

Hopefully other anti-lgbtq politicians like him will take notice

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2MuchNoise kcoates B.See multigraincracker DBoon Random Boomer

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Advocate.com: Graham consistently denied being gay [View all] QueerDuck Yesterday OP

Most people on our side of the aisle only found it amusing because he was a Republican and hung around with Vinca Yesterday #1

Does it matter, realistically. In the grand scheme of things why do we care? Srkdqltr Yesterday #2

I think it matters because public policy has real-world consequences. QueerDuck Yesterday #4

Yes , but he's dead. Legacy is nothing. It will change over time. Even the most well known have their back story change Srkdqltr Yesterday #6

Yes, he's dead. I already addressed that. The consequences of his actions did not die with him. QueerDuck Yesterday #10

Agree 100 percent, QD... B.See Yesterday #14

Now if someone steps forward with multigraincracker Yesterday #28

The legislation he authored and voted for is on record. I think that's why it matters Torchlight 13 hrs ago #35

I care because I'm gay Random Boomer 15 hrs ago #30

I just figured the man was asexual . Dan Yesterday #3

There were alleged male prostitutes that would disagree with that assessment mr715 Yesterday #5

If he was gay he would've been a lot more outspoken against gay marriage biocube Yesterday #7

While he may have been homosexual, he wasn't gay. David__77 Yesterday #8

Are you being ridiculous or making a joke? ColoringFool Yesterday #19

What an odd response. Random Boomer 15 hrs ago #31

Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't Sympthsical Yesterday #9

There is a author I have read a bunch of his books Tree Lady Yesterday #18

The guy from Cinepals, per chance? Hassin Bin Sober Yesterday #23

HOW DID YOU KNOW?! Sympthsical Yesterday #24

LOL Hassin Bin Sober Yesterday #25

I love this pull from absolute left field Sympthsical Yesterday #29

Somebody is going to cash in a write a book about being Graham's lover Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #11

Does he have a "porn stash buddy"? QueerDuck Yesterday #15

Here's my take, and it''ll be controversial SpankMe Yesterday #12

His hypocrisy is the heart of the matter. mr715 Yesterday #13

Your 3rd paragraph is quite illogical. If a gay politician...... ColoringFool Yesterday #17

Trappings wasn't a good word, but I was struggling to make a point SpankMe Yesterday #22

I get your point, I just disagree Random Boomer 15 hrs ago #32

It MATTERS because, I firmly believe, LG allowed himself to be blackmailed... . ColoringFool Yesterday #16

I couldn't have cared less what his sexual orientation was. I don't care what anyone's sexual orientation is. Raftergirl Yesterday #20

The whole thing is b.s. Being never married isn't an indication of anything. valleyrogue Yesterday #21

Marriage is not a tell, either way Random Boomer 15 hrs ago #33

Then why hasn't there been any reliable reporting on it? valleyrogue 13 hrs ago #34

The way he talked confused homophobes. rickyhall Yesterday #26

Omg..he was gay. evemac Yesterday #27