Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PATRICK

(12,448 posts)
2. I remember 2008
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 02:46 PM
Tuesday

The most significant mail commitment reduction in our history. And other uses of "the damage hasn't been done yet" argument and can be reversed rationale. Like inflationary prices, I have never seen reversals at all. It's a moot argument if the damage is going forward into its "now push the button too late!" phase. Especially for an election! I suppose legal experts will back the judge on this, but it shouldn't be unless the approach of the plaintiffs was wrong.

Instead of the Voting Rights Act, the all powerful wizard of the executive gets to prohibit states from conducting elections(by mail or otherwise) on a fake premise with prejudicial lists for political advantage. Jim Crow for the absolutist monarch.

By just our system limitations it is INHERENTLY disenfranchising of voter rights and mailer rights. If you believe otherwise you believe AI is always right and can do anything. And our Postal software is no AI.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-USPS eyes new ...»Reply #2