Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,554 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2026, 10:31 AM Yesterday

Trump UFC fight's corporate sponsors refuse to condemn ugly smear of Michelle Obama [View all]

These sponsors are all assholes and need to be boycotted

Paramount, Meta, Dodge, Crypto.com, Polymarket, and Bud Light need to be boycotted..

Trump UFC fight's corporate sponsors refuse to condemn ugly smear of Michelle Obama
www.rawstory.com/michelle-oba...

Darbyscastle (@darbyscastle.bsky.social) 2026-06-16T14:22:39.865Z

https://www.rawstory.com/michelle-obama-2677046126/

More than 24 hours after the conclusion of Donald Trump's controversial White House UFC fight, high-profile sponsors of the event are staying conspicuously silent about a vulgar smear of former First Lady Michelle Obama that was broadcast on Paramount+.....

Most damning: Paramount, which exclusively carried the White House fights on its streaming platform, has not only refused to comment as of late Monday night, but left Hokit's smear available on Paramount+ without editing—a stark departure from standard broadcast practice when crude remarks are aired live.

David Ellison's company wasn't alone in going silent. Status' Oliver Darcy reached out to multiple major UFC sponsors—Meta, Dodge, Crypto.com, Polymarket, and Bud Light—whose logos were prominently displayed throughout the broadcast to millions of viewers. None responded by late Monday night to requests for comment about whether they found the attack acceptable or believed such rhetoric belonged at a White House event.

That led Darcy to observe, "Of course, if the circumstances were even slightly different, it’s not difficult to imagine many of these same companies rushing to denounce the smear. After all, it wasn’t an offhand comment made on an obscure podcast. It was delivered during a well-promoted nationally televised event staged on the South Lawn of the White House—all with their company logos displayed prominently throughout. It’s safe to assume that if a fighter had taken the microphone and lobbed a similarly crude smear at ugly Melania Trump, the White House and the corporations eager to maintain favor with it would not have responded with the same deafening silence."
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump UFC fight's corpora...