Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(22,519 posts)

2. Well, need our loop hole i guess

Fri Jun 12, 2026, 10:59 AM

Jun 12

What if the $100.00 deduction would be if that person in the state would just REGISTER to vote? (I'm thinking if they do that, they would vote?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

18 U.S. Code � 597 - Expenditures to influence voting TheProle Jun 12 #1

Well, need our loop hole i guess bluestarone Jun 12 #2

Some scammer would find a way to exploit it gopher fixer Jun 12 #4

So Elon Musk is in jail right now, right? W_HAMILTON Jun 12 #6

But isn't a tax break NOT an expenditure? gopher fixer Jun 12 #3

Welcome to DU LetMyPeopleVote Jun 12 #7

A tax break requires a tax liability to be used. marble falls Saturday #8