Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nuxvomica

(14,368 posts)
3. It's hard to argue against AI without sounding like a "hater"
Fri Jun 12, 2026, 03:31 AM
Jun 12

Because there is almost nothing worthwhile about it. Environmentally, fiscally, and socially it's a disaster. For most purposes, it simply doesn't do what it is supposed to do, it is used as a pretext to offshore tech jobs, and it is only going to get smart enough to be dangerous, like members of the Trump Administration. And it creates a huge accountability crisis: if AI's "thoughts" can be put into action at the bot's own discretion, who's responsible for any subsequent harm? I would like it limited to use as a tool in science and medicine but without any agency. Just yesterday, I got an email from a friend who had to replace an entire AC unit because the main circuit board failed. I had "smart reply" in Gmail turned on by default and I've been amused by the AI suggestions for responses. But this time the AI created a completely fictional story about me having a similar issue with a printer two years ago. WTF!

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corporations Reeling From...»Reply #3