Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,818 posts)
9. Our problem in this case is that many of us regard...
Thu Jun 11, 2026, 02:11 PM
Jun 11

...so called "renewable energy" as a way to address the use of fossil fuels. However the reactionary stance of this approach, making our energy supplies depend on the weather at a time the weather has been destabilized hasn't worked, isn't working and won't work.

There are Democrats signing on to what will work, nuclear energy. My own Governor, Mikie Sherrill is among them; Gretchen Whitmer is another.

Fossil fuels are incredibly destructive but they are some things that so called "renewable energy" aren't, reliable and energy dense.

The 30 most reliable power plants in the United States are nuclear plants. They are also the cleanest and safest power plants in the United Stares.

I have been a Democrat my whole adult life and I've suffered under the weight of antinukism among us for much of it.

I will not live long enough to see the sea change on this issue but "I've been to the mountain top" to steal a Kingian line.

The collapse of the planetary atmosphere is the most profound crisis in human history in my view, although many seem not to agree. Our party understands that it is an issue, perhaps not with the exigency that I see, but we need to open our eyes to what must be done to address it. Energy poverty is not an answer, and if we try to sell it as so we will fail.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY Times: Democrats Once ...»Reply #9