Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Botany

(78,035 posts)

20. Trump lost 61 out of the 62 cases he took to court to show the 2020 election was dirty.

Reply to Kid Berwyn (Reply #13)

Mon Jun 8, 2026, 09:06 AM

13 hrs ago

And that was because he had no evidence of the election being dirty, all of his real lawyers
from Porter Wright quit because they wanted to keep their licenses to practice law and Trump
wanted them to suborn perjury, and the one case he did win was overturned. Trump’s observers
got to sit 2 feet closer to watch them recounting the vote.

Btw Republican appointed judges including ones appointed by Trump ruled against him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kid Berwyn

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What should have been KRISTEN WELKER's answer to Trump's you are either crooked or stupid. [View all] Botany 16 hrs ago OP

She should have opened her purse malaise 16 hrs ago #1

As soon as he started his insults, she could have ended the interview Raven123 16 hrs ago #2

Disagree... Happy Hoosier 14 hrs ago #18

This is Trump's level of discourse Chasstev365 16 hrs ago #3

What I Think She Should Have Said Is... ProfessorGAC 15 hrs ago #4

"Please, continue" .... OneGrassRoot 15 hrs ago #5

I'd would have a hard time not slapping him across his pudgy face... MiHale 15 hrs ago #6

They shouldn't give him camera time to begin with, but Emile 15 hrs ago #7

Maybe she should have gotten up and left. Leave the bloated asshole sitting there muttering to himself. Vinca 15 hrs ago #8

Without a shred of irony she says he'll be back for another "interview ". Boomerproud 15 hrs ago #9

Reading many of the answers, I think she was better than the alternative mentioned karynnj 14 hrs ago #10

Maybe you're right, but I think kicking him in the nuts would have Emile 14 hrs ago #14

I think the secret service would intervene karynnj 14 hrs ago #16

LOL, I'm sure they would have. Emile 14 hrs ago #17

The traitor exposed who he really is. Kid Berwyn 14 hrs ago #11

Trump and his cronies remind me of Lincoln's comment on his Sec. of the Navy, "He would steal the ... Botany 14 hrs ago #12

It was remarkable. Kid Berwyn 14 hrs ago #13

Trump lost 61 out of the 62 cases he took to court to show the 2020 election was dirty. Botany 13 hrs ago #20

The judge let observers get close enough to actually see the vote counted questionseverything 12 hrs ago #21

Maybe, Sir, youre just too stupid to understand my Johonny 14 hrs ago #15

I would love to see someone reply to him ON CAMERA, "I know you are, but what am I?" tanyev 14 hrs ago #19

So everybody is crooked except for you and Fox News, is that correct? Mysterian 12 hrs ago #22

MaddowBlog-On election claims, Trump triggered by 'evidence' callout on 'Meet the Press' interview LetMyPeopleVote 7 hrs ago #23

What she said was a good response. I believe it was something to the effect of GoodRaisin 7 hrs ago #24