Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarisataka

(22,948 posts)
101. Which genocide
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 05:28 PM
Saturday
Following is a list of the current genocides, their location, the approximate year they began, and the death toll estimates.

-Tibet, 1953-present: 400,000-1.2 million+ Tibetans killed under the occupation of the People’s Republic of China.
It was the People’s Liberation Army of China which invaded in the 1950s and began the killings, deportations, cultural and religious suppression, and military occupation. The Chinese communist government has committed many acts of genocide, intentional famine, and ethnic cleansing over the last eight decades. Do not be fooled by their military’s name, the People’s Liberation Army, they are a communist country and use the military and the state to commit genocides and massacres.
-Sri Lanka, 1956-present: 154,000-253,818+ Tamils killed. The UN and US have been called complicit in this genocide, which had particularly violent years during their civil war which began in 1983.
-North Korean prison camps, 1959-present: Unknown thousands, perhaps millions, have passed through the vast network of prison and “reeducation” camps, with an unknown number of deaths.
Conditions are so deplorable that an estimated 40% of prisoners die of malnutrition/starvation, and unknown thousands die at the hands of the guards. As of 2019, an estimated 80,000-200,000 prisoners were imprisoned in the camp network.
-Papua New Guinea, 1962-present: 100,000-500,000 killed.
-Colombia, 1964-present: 220,000-800,000 killed and at least 7 million displaced.
-Hmong people in Southeast Asia, 1975-present: 100,000-300,000 Hmong and other minorities killed.
-Tigray, Ethiopia, 1990-present: 2-6 million people are “missing” and over 2 million are displaced.
A discrepancy of 4 million people is quite large, one might question the validity of estimates like this. There are many things preventing accurate death tolls and missing tolls, but most importantly is that the crisis is not over so proper investigations cannot be completed so information is often reported by the citizens. Most often, the people committing the genocide will underestimate the deaths or disappearances, and sometimes those suffering will inflate the numbers. Sometimes people have no birth records, often there are no death records, some people could escape and disappear themselves, and many are likely dead but there is no evidence, so they become part of the “missing” statistic.
-Afghanistan, 1996-present: An unknown amount of ethnic minorities, especially the Hazara people, killed in dozens of massacres, including the Mazar-i-Sharif massacre, when 2,000-20,000 people were killed.
In rural and impoverished areas such as in Afghanistan, people often cannot get birth certificates for their babies, thus making it harder to determine an accurate census and death toll for massacres. A study done in 2017 found that only 42% of Afghan children over age five had a birth certificate, and prior to the 21st century most adults would not have had one. Therefore, when the Taliban or ISIS/ISIL massacres a secluded village, killing undocumented people, and burning the evidence, those people did not have a birth record or a death record, and nobody was able to investigate. Victims are killed and buried in mass graves, drowned, or buried in wells, and these crimes are not often investigated by outside agencies.
-Democratic Republic of the Congo, early 2000s-present, an unknown number of deaths (they are not often counted) due to “artisanal mining” in slave-like conditions, and over 5.5 million people are displaced.
Some do not consider the crisis to be a genocide because it is forced labor, child labor, and human trafficking. And the history of slavery, generally, is not often thought of as a genocide, but slavery is in fact genocide. What is happening to the Congolese is a genocide if one only considers part of the definition from Article II of the Convention, “Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group,” and, “Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,” regardless of mass killings or not.
-Darfur, Sudan, 2003-present: 98,000-500,000 killed and at least 10.7 million people are displaced.
-Libya, 2011-present: 15,000-30,000 killed in 2011 alone, hundreds more are killed each year, however there is strong media censorship in Libya.
-Mali, 2012-present; 10,800+ killed and over 5 million displaced.
-Syria, 2013-present; 116,000+ killed and over 11 million displaced.
--Yemen, 2014-present; 233,000+ killed and 4.5 million displaced.
-China, 2014-present; at least 2 million ethnic minorities (primarily the Uyghur ethnic group) have been detained in “re-education camps” with an unknown death toll.
-Burkina Faso, 2016-present; 1,850+ killed and at least 1 million displaced.
-Cameroon, 2016-present; 6,000+ killed and 600,000+ displaced.
-Myanmar, 2016-present; 25,000-43,000+ killed and over 1 million displaced.
-Ukraine, 2022-present; 10,000+ killed, over 12 million displaced, and between 900,000 and 1.6 million people forcibly deported to Russia, including unaccompanied abducted children.
The Former Soviet Union has a long history of forcibly displacing and relocating civilians, and those who support the Soviet brand of communism will deny this as well as the current genocide of Ukrainians. Forced deportations and removing children from families is part of the definition of genocide, as well.
-Gaza (occupied Palestine), 2023-present; 41,788+ killed, 21,000+ missing, and 2 million displaced.
Estimates of deaths rise up to 180,000+ based on historical data of genocides and a lack of data from the Gaza health ministry which collapsed a few months into the genocide.

Note: All of these death tolls are as of September 2024.


https://truthlytics.com/20-ongoing-genocides-you-should-know-about/

All of them are worthy of OPs

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's either that or Collin's Trump stamp lame54 Saturday #1
So if I am understanding sarisataka Saturday #8
Kicking Collins to the curb is acceptable... lame54 Saturday #14
I have no disagreement with that sarisataka Saturday #16
I don't think the symbol is being defended Figarosmom Saturday #49
There are several posts below sarisataka Saturday #53
Who is defending a Nazi symbol, other than the far right? idahoblue Saturday #77
Read the replies sarisataka Saturday #79
So what conclusion is to be drawn about these so-called defenders CivicGrief Yesterday #186
Finally, perhaps some reflection sarisataka Yesterday #192
I just don't see the responses as going down the path of revisionist history. CivicGrief Yesterday #193
Understandable sarisataka Yesterday #197
Learning moments are good for the nation's soul. CivicGrief Yesterday #198
I don't think it's being defended... buzzycrumbhunger Saturday #128
It is being defended sarisataka Saturday #131
They can still go with Janet Mills. LisaL Saturday #26
Although still on the ballot... lame54 Saturday #27
She is on the ballot and people can vote for her if they wish. LisaL Saturday #32
Maine does have Ranked Choice Voting TVguyCards Saturday #62
Welcome to DU! KS Toronado Saturday #81
Thank you :) TVguyCards Saturday #85
Janet Mills polls behind susan collins. Graham polls ahead. BComplex Saturday #88
Kind of meaningless to consider polling LisaL Saturday #134
Mills has no chance whatsoever ExtraGriz Yesterday #177
They were stolen symbols and no shouldn't Blue Full Moon Yesterday #175
This symbol? sarisataka Yesterday #195
No, you're making a big deal of it oldmanlynn Yesterday #182
I specifically did not make that connection sarisataka Yesterday #196
You don't have to sell your soul iemanja Saturday #96
Mills and Costello are still on the ballot obamanut2012 Saturday #122
But why is Platner our only choice against Collins? yardwork Yesterday #176
Did he really vote for Trump three times? iemanja 23 hrs ago #207
I read that he did but just checked and he said he did not. yardwork 21 hrs ago #210
Yeah, after I saw your post, I checked. iemanja 19 hrs ago #211
Hillary would have been a Great President. Cha 13 hrs ago #215
If we want to a purity test have Pete Hegseth take off his shirt Ritabert Saturday #2
Would anyone here defend Hegseth? LisaL Saturday #3
Just saying that the GOP has one standard for themselves and one for us. Ritabert Saturday #37
Here no. But Republicans and Faux News would. Ritabert Saturday #41
My bad opinion of Hegseth Mossfern Saturday #150
For real Jilly_in_VA Saturday #151
Is anyone defending his tattos sarisataka Saturday #10
Or that he got them when he was drunk? LisaL Saturday #11
As I tried pointing out- it is NOT (!!!) about any tattoo sarisataka Saturday #17
Yes ABC123Easy Saturday #20
I am agreeing with your points. LisaL Saturday #23
I didn't mean to seem in opposition sarisataka Saturday #28
Of course people here would not defend Hegesth if he got the exact same tattoo when drunk. LisaL Saturday #30
I haven't seen one post claiming it is not a Nazi symbol. nt LAS14 Saturday #64
Hegseth is a Republican. Republicans do not have to defend their behavior. JustABozoOnThisBus Saturday #31
So the argument is, if you can't beat them, join them? LisaL Saturday #33
Only if the split in the Senate is close. JustABozoOnThisBus Saturday #35
I get the sentiment Mz Pip Saturday #48
The point being: when did he get the tattoo? Ritabert Saturday #42
Too late. He's already been called a Nazi on DU. AloeVera Saturday #91
I don't think anyone's called him a Nazi and I don't think he is EX500rider Saturday #116
... and so we advocate withholding support Mossfern Saturday #121
I didn't advocate anything I just think he has a lot of red flags in my opinion EX500rider Saturday #126
What does bringing up "red flags" mean then? Mossfern Saturday #127
And Collins doesn't????? That's the choice. marble falls Saturday #160
It's means I wish Maine had found someone with less baggage to run. EX500rider Saturday #167
The point is winning against actual fascists. Envirogal Saturday #108
The fact that Franken defenders still diminish what he did is wrong EdmondDantes_ Saturday #68
I read the article and remember it well. Envirogal Yesterday #199
Well, hello again. n/t rzemanfl Yesterday #201
They are the party of white supremacy iemanja Saturday #98
You really want Collins... lame54 Yesterday #185
I do NOT want Collins iemanja 23 hrs ago #206
Simple -misanthroptimist Saturday #4
The same can be said for the swastika sarisataka Saturday #12
No it wouldn't be the same... -misanthroptimist Saturday #39
What is the difference? sarisataka Saturday #43
Look, until this nonsense... -misanthroptimist Saturday #45
I recognized it immediately sarisataka Saturday #51
You can say anything you want -misanthroptimist Saturday #58
Incorrect sarisataka Saturday #60
If you are not making that assertion... -misanthroptimist Saturday #66
Stop opposing Nazism and historical revisionism? sarisataka Saturday #69
Very clearly illogical -misanthroptimist Saturday #73
The question was never about the tattoo sarisataka Saturday #76
Then, as I said, the tattoo is irrelevant. -misanthroptimist Saturday #87
Let me phrase this clearly- since it doesn't matter if I type slowly sarisataka Saturday #92
Stop dodging -misanthroptimist Saturday #104
You refuse to accept what I have stated sarisataka Saturday #109
Nonsense -misanthroptimist Saturday #137
I never heard of a totenkopf until this story, either. Americanme Saturday #140
Couldn't agree more -misanthroptimist Saturday #141
Let me try explaining it. WarGamer Yesterday #202
But the death head skull is NOT as universally known as a nazi hate symbol, like the swastika. Americanme Yesterday #203
Do you believe he knew that? Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #205
I'd be willing to bet a fairly large amount of money that the tattoo shop catalog where he bought it Jack Valentino Saturday #165
I would bet you are correct sarisataka Saturday #169
Speak and so it shall be so. Behind the Aegis Saturday #47
Because Fox News wants control of the senate. Initech Saturday #5
Care to share examples of the behavior in question? RockRaven Saturday #6
Post number 4 is one example sarisataka Saturday #13
Young people love lighting bolts and i never heard of them being nazi symbols before now questionseverything 6 hrs ago #228
Have you never seen this? sarisataka 3 hrs ago #241
No I haven't seen that before that I remember questionseverything 23 min ago #242
Why is so little effort being spent promoting other D candidates in the upcoming primary? RandomNumbers Saturday #7
Why did Sanders endorse Fetterman? LisaL Saturday #9
True, but what about Warren? RandomNumbers Saturday #15
We actually had a very good democratic alternative to Fetterman in a primary. LisaL Saturday #21
Because Nazis killed Jews Danmel Saturday #18
They might for Platner MorbidButterflyTat Saturday #24
That would be interesting to see what would happen sarisataka Saturday #34
Poor Sarisataka ABC123Easy Saturday #19
I saw that but sarisataka Saturday #22
Good for you! ABC123Easy Saturday #25
I showed this thread to my children sarisataka Saturday #149
Weaponized ignorance -- excellent term. betsuni Saturday #168
Smart kids! sheshe2 5 hrs ago #234
It was an opinion piece not an article, an article implies facts questionseverything Saturday #29
Really? As one of the less hostile repliers from yesterday..... ABC123Easy Saturday #36
I saw so many swatikas in India, they must all be Nazi's too Shellback Squid Saturday #38
Does that make swastikas acceptable everywhere sarisataka Saturday #44
yes, like an ankh, I have friend who has a devil tat on his shoulder, does that make him a devil worshiper? Shellback Squid 19 hrs ago #212
A swastika is as innocuous as as ankh sarisataka 7 hrs ago #216
the German SS was only one of many meanings... mike_c Saturday #40
Will you say the same of other Nazi symbols sarisataka Saturday #46
As an art student, I saw many designs through history that included the swastika. calimary Saturday #118
K&R WhiskeyGrinder Saturday #50
I think we need to look at intent Bluestocking Saturday #52
The skull and crossed femurs has a long history TexLaProgressive Saturday #54
No one is trying to 'rehabilitate' the Nazis RetiredParatrooper Saturday #55
Who is that guy? nt LAS14 Saturday #70
Since the photo of von Mackensen sarisataka Saturday #75
That's not a Totenkopf. Llewlladdwr 3 hrs ago #240
The rules of DU require that we support Platner if he's the nominee Kaleva Saturday #56
And at no point have I stated sarisataka Saturday #67
I haven't paid much attention to the debate about the tattoo Kaleva Saturday #161
Fair enough sarisataka Saturday #163
Same to you! Kaleva Saturday #164
At this moment, he is the PRESUMPTIVE nominee. Their primary niyad Saturday #155
True Kaleva Saturday #162
One needs only to look at other political figures to answer that. RandySF Saturday #57
No one is defending the symbol, including platner. pat_k Saturday #59
Post above your show that statement is false sarisataka Saturday #63
I see no one defending the symbol. pat_k Saturday #97
And I was never asking about any man sarisataka Saturday #103
I see no posts that say that. You have to give me verbatim quotes (in context) that you read that way. pat_k Saturday #114
Post 4 sarisataka Saturday #117
Who's defending it? Nt LAS14 Saturday #61
Have you read the replies sarisataka Saturday #65
I searched for it and found it in #4, which you referenced... LAS14 Saturday #72
There are many others in this thread sarisataka Saturday #78
I have never denied or diminished the connection. I have simply wondered... LAS14 Saturday #119
I haven't said you have denied its meaning. sarisataka Saturday #132
OK. nt LAS14 Saturday #152
Just sayin'... buzzycrumbhunger Saturday #133
Think about this. CivicGrief Saturday #71
That was not my question, as I clearly stated sarisataka Saturday #80
The question is not in a vacuum. It is in relation to Platner. CivicGrief Saturday #82
Never said that, never implied that sarisataka Saturday #86
Platner was a sexist choice Pris Saturday #113
The symbol or offensive tattoo can be fairly easily removed Grim Chieftain Saturday #74
Yes, exactly. WestMichRad Saturday #110
Yeah, it's gotten cringingly weird now Sympthsical Saturday #83
Come on folks TVguyCards Saturday #84
You get it /nt sarisataka Saturday #89
Enough! MineralMan Saturday #90
The tattoo behind all of this orangecrush Saturday #94
I will not stop opposing or rehabilitating Nazis, their legacy and symbols. sarisataka Saturday #95
Nobody has done that. MineralMan Saturday #99
They have, in this thread sarisataka Saturday #105
MM is right. AloeVera Saturday #153
I have not seen Platner called a Nazi but I have no reason to doubt it. I haven't followed every thread. sarisataka Saturday #156
I agree with you, but it's fruitless here right now obamanut2012 7 hrs ago #218
Rec'd Mossfern Saturday #154
I'm more curious as to how someone can defend an ongoing genocide, and endless wars instead of a tattoo; which Uncle Joe Saturday #93
Which genocide sarisataka Saturday #101
Any genocide, but particularly ones that our government, and our tax dollars are supporting. n/t Uncle Joe Saturday #102
Are we allowed to condemn the perpetrators of all the genocides? CivicGrief Saturday #143
Probably not the ones defended here daily for nearly 2 years. AloeVera Saturday #157
Intellectual and moral integrity iemanja Saturday #100
+1 demmiblue Saturday #106
who is defending that symbol??? LymphocyteLover Saturday #107
Again- read the replies sarisataka Saturday #111
OK, but your OP mentioned it... so I wasn't sure what you were referring to LymphocyteLover Yesterday #172
Bullshit. This was not a "Nazi symbol" per se Bluetus Saturday #112
The particular symbol sarisataka Saturday #115
Be honest. When did you learn about this symbol? Bluetus Saturday #135
6th grade sarisataka Saturday #139
The totenkopf tattoo is a NAZI symbol LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #123
Nice. So if I have a T-shirt that has an arrow pointing upward, you will call me a Nazi? Bluetus Saturday #138
It is 100% a known Nazi symbol obamanut2012 7 hrs ago #220
I have yet to see anyone defend the symbol Buzz cook Saturday #120
Read the thread sarisataka Saturday #130
This tattoo really bothers me LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #124
Would a Democratically-controlled US Senate bother you, if Platner Jack Valentino Saturday #166
Isn't the tattoo still there, but covered up? lapucelle Yesterday #180
I would like to see a Democrat defeat Collins but I do not believe that Platner is the right person LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #183
Well said. mcar Yesterday #200
Post removed Post removed Saturday #125
Post removed Post removed Saturday #129
Before this I had now idea what a totenkopf was. Hassin Bin Sober Saturday #136
No. You absolutely did! CivicGrief Yesterday #187
He had the tattoo covered many months ago. Collins is still voting to fund the GESTAPO struggle4progress Saturday #142
That there is the correct perspective -misanthroptimist Saturday #146
Why is so much effort being spent trying to destroy a Democrat on this forum? n/t luv2fly Saturday #144
I hesitate to guess -misanthroptimist Saturday #145
That would be against the SOP sarisataka Saturday #147
Graham Platner reminds me a lot of Adam Kokesh Polybius Saturday #148
Maybe its just an awkward tattoo just like Musk's hitler salute was a awkward gesture per the ADL? Eko Saturday #158
The only thing awkward about Musk's gesture sarisataka Saturday #170
I agree. Eko Saturday #171
Being offended is a choice. Intractable Saturday #159
Yeah, those six million Jews murdered under that symbol only chose to be offended iemanja 23 hrs ago #208
Being offended by Platner is a choice. Intractable 21 hrs ago #209
Chanting the magic slogan Medicare for All trumps The Curse of the Totenkopf. betsuni Yesterday #173
No. They cede power by thinking they CivicGrief Yesterday #179
I don't understand. betsuni Yesterday #188
I'm talking about Democrats who think moving to the center (hence, centrist) right is the CivicGrief Yesterday #189
It's not the tattoo, it's the attack from centrists against progressive candidates. Emile Yesterday #174
What exactly makes Platner "progressive"? He's against an assault weapons ban, lapucelle Yesterday #184
I love me a genuine progressive. You may even say CivicGrief Yesterday #191
And his underwear?! MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #213
It does look like he's dancing shirtless in his underwear. lapucelle 14 hrs ago #214
His family and friends at a wedding reception? mr715 7 hrs ago #217
Imagine someone taking off their shirt and pants at a wedding and dancing around. lapucelle 6 hrs ago #223
Imagine a joyful event having joy mr715 6 hrs ago #224
Weddings are joyful ceremonies. Whether or not a guest or relative taking off some clothes and doing a dance lapucelle 6 hrs ago #225
I've sang shirtless at parties at other people's request. mr715 6 hrs ago #226
Yes, but were you wearing pants? lapucelle 5 hrs ago #232
Yes but only because I have skinny chicken legs. mr715 5 hrs ago #233
"Who among us has not been asked to sing shirtless at a wedding?" lapucelle 5 hrs ago #235
Who cares? mr715 5 hrs ago #236
It's amazing how some people are comfortable commenting on others personal behavior at private Nanjeanne 5 hrs ago #237
"We are oft to blame in this... Torchlight Yesterday #178
More circular firing, squad stuff right here oldmanlynn Yesterday #181
Oh of course there are numerous DUers who don't care about winning elections. BannonsLiver 7 hrs ago #219
I have read and reread this very long thread before responding. cksmithy Yesterday #190
I appreciate your attention and thoughtful reply sarisataka Yesterday #194
Platner rso 23 hrs ago #204
Just curious about the forum rules. Can somebody clarify? Bluetus 7 hrs ago #221
What rule are you positing is being violated by this thread? What makes you think it's being violated here? tritsofme 7 hrs ago #222
"Bashing" Bluetus 6 hrs ago #227
The OP provides a factual history lesson, I'm not sure how it could plausibly be considered "bashing" tritsofme 6 hrs ago #231
I'll venture a guess. H2O Man 5 hrs ago #238
Sorry, I am not the person to ask for rule interpretations sarisataka 6 hrs ago #229
Remember when fundamentalist Xtians attacked Proctor and Gamble for its "Satanic" logo? Ponietz 6 hrs ago #230
Strawman sarisataka 3 hrs ago #239
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is so much effort bei...»Reply #101