General Discussion

PatSeg

(53,630 posts)

52. I agree that gender was against her

Reply to senseandsensibility (Reply #10)

Wed May 27, 2026, 06:18 PM

21 hrs ago

Voter suppression and other republican tricks didn't help, but in the end, it is easier for them to defeat a highly qualified woman than any man with fewer qualifications.

Quite honestly, I was actually surprised at how good Kamala was on the campaign trail and Tim Waltz was a brilliant choice for a running mate. Together they were amazing, quite unlike Trump's weird and disjointed campaign. He was running as if he already knew he was going to win.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

senseandsensibility SammyWinstonJack Thew Wednesdays FakeNoose

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I see that James Talarico is doing something that Kamala did not [View all] senseandsensibility Yesterday OP

Yes! leftieNanner Yesterday #1

Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility Yesterday #3

It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 22 hrs ago #41

Kick dalton99a Yesterday #2

It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife Yesterday #4

I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility Yesterday #5

Agreed. I am not religious either. His voice is important. travelingthrulife 4 hrs ago #87

The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k 22 hrs ago #30

That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito 19 hrs ago #65

That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k 18 hrs ago #67

They aren't all Christian Nationalists though, many just have a really hateful interpretation travelingthrulife 4 hrs ago #88

If they have no interest in discriminating or reshaping law in accord with their beliefs, they aren't violating... pat_k 3 hrs ago #91

My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX 22 hrs ago #42

This is great. I want to share with my fundie Trump lovers in my family. But its way too small to read for them LiberalLovinLug 3 min ago #94

Trump needed no defining leftstreet Yesterday #6

Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility Yesterday #7

No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus Yesterday #11

Good points senseandsensibility Yesterday #12

I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything 23 hrs ago #22

But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus 22 hrs ago #33

That's not true Mad_Machine76 21 hrs ago #50

That is not my recollection Bluetus 20 hrs ago #58

Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 20 hrs ago #59

I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus 20 hrs ago #62

I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 19 hrs ago #64

I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus 18 hrs ago #66

Disagree questionseverything 20 hrs ago #61

I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB 22 hrs ago #36

The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 17 hrs ago #72

Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB 15 hrs ago #76

I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 15 hrs ago #78

+1 leftstreet 23 hrs ago #23

Not this again... lame54 22 hrs ago #43

+a zillion nt spooky3 17 hrs ago #71

Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni 15 hrs ago #77

FDR who said... mountain grammy 6 hrs ago #84

I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg Yesterday #8

I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility Yesterday #10

I agree that gender was against her PatSeg 21 hrs ago #52

You have to draw contrasts Bluetus 22 hrs ago #35

Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB 22 hrs ago #40

Good point. Bluetus 20 hrs ago #56

Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary 18 hrs ago #70

Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove 8 hrs ago #79

Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit 21 hrs ago #48

Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg 20 hrs ago #55

IDK Lemon Lyman Yesterday #9

They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib 22 hrs ago #24

Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit 21 hrs ago #49

There's a bit more to it. wnylib 20 hrs ago #54

Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib 19 hrs ago #63

do not forget the double standard Skittles 23 hrs ago #13

Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #14

she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles 23 hrs ago #17

It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus 22 hrs ago #38

The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight 21 hrs ago #47

It has so far. Bluetus 20 hrs ago #57

Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k 23 hrs ago #15

Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill 23 hrs ago #16

Message auto-removed Name removed 3 hrs ago #90

Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir 23 hrs ago #18

Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel 23 hrs ago #19

I worked for an attorney The Wizard 22 hrs ago #34

Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 17 hrs ago #74

He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard 7 hrs ago #83

I understand that, but people widely believe polygraphs are spooky3 3 hrs ago #89

Nailed it orangecrush 23 hrs ago #20

The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda 23 hrs ago #21

Thank you. /nt spudspud 22 hrs ago #26

Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid 22 hrs ago #27

Running for the Senate MineralMan 22 hrs ago #25

He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter 22 hrs ago #28

Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado 22 hrs ago #29

Can we please not do this? Politicub 22 hrs ago #31

In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard 22 hrs ago #32

Wow senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago #37

More corrupt than Trump? lame54 22 hrs ago #39

You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF 21 hrs ago #44

I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc 17 hrs ago #73

what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 21 hrs ago #45

Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit 21 hrs ago #46

The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan 21 hrs ago #51

Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream 20 hrs ago #53

I see.... sheshe2 20 hrs ago #60

Ummm... Unca Jim 18 hrs ago #68

She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni 18 hrs ago #69

Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear 16 hrs ago #75

What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda 8 hrs ago #80

Its called branding Historic NY 8 hrs ago #81

I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic 7 hrs ago #82

You have a point, especially after 45 years of incessant smearing of liberals lostnfound 5 hrs ago #85

Also bring up every time Old Crank 5 hrs ago #86

K&R red dog 1 1 hr ago #92

Ay, ay, ay, que rico Talarico Miami Blue 30 min ago #93