Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BURGUM: When the sun goes down, solar produces zero electricity HUFFMAN: I want to enter into the record this amazing [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,816 posts)109. MaddowBlog-On renewable energy, Interior's Burgum offers a case study in willful ignorance
People keep trying to tell the Trump Cabinet secretary that battery power exists. He keeps saying foolish things about renewable energy anyway.
On renewable energy, Interiorâs Burgum offers a case study in willful ignorance - MS NOW apple.news/ANlNBbErJRBa...
— (@oc88.bsky.social) 2026-05-14T14:07:07.725Z
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/bergum-trump-interior-renewable-energy
Unfortunately, hes not the only Republican whos expressed confusion about this. The New Republic reported:
The Cabinet secretary, toeing the GOP line, told Huffman that solar arrays produce zero electricity after sundown.
Mr. Chairman, I request unanimous consent to enter in the record this amazing new technology that apparently the secretary is unaware of: Its a battery, the California Democrat replied. Chinas figured it out. Thats why theyre cleaning our clock on clean energy.
.....But as people keep trying to help Burgum understand, battery technology exists. As MS NOW host Catherine Rampell explained in a Washington Post column a couple of years ago:
Since that column was first published, U.S. battery storage capacity had an even better year in 2025.
If Burgum made one foolish comment about this years ago, because he wasnt up to speed on the relevant details, he could be forgiven for being confused. But the fact that he keeps making the same mistake, even after being presented with the facts, highlights the difference between ignorance and willful ignorance.
The secretary of the interior should presumably know how solar power generation works. On Wednesday, Doug Burgum showed that he does not.
Burgum was testifying before the House Natural Resources Committee, and exposed himself under questioning from Democratic Representative Jared Huffman, who brought up energy projects in Nevada.
The Cabinet secretary, toeing the GOP line, told Huffman that solar arrays produce zero electricity after sundown.
Mr. Chairman, I request unanimous consent to enter in the record this amazing new technology that apparently the secretary is unaware of: Its a battery, the California Democrat replied. Chinas figured it out. Thats why theyre cleaning our clock on clean energy.
BURGUM: When the sun goes down, solar produces zero electricity
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-05-13T15:05:00.011Z
HUFFMAN: I want to enter into the record this amazing new technology that apparently the secretary is unaware of -- it's a battery
.....But as people keep trying to help Burgum understand, battery technology exists. As MS NOW host Catherine Rampell explained in a Washington Post column a couple of years ago:
Growth in clean-electricity generation is a longer-term trend driven largely by technological improvements that have improved solars and winds cost-competitiveness. But recent policy changes, such Bidens 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, have also accelerated development. The same forces are boosting battery development, which is helping solve intermittency problems caused by relying on wind or solar when the weather doesnt cooperate. The Energy Information Administration recently forecast that U.S. battery storage capacity will nearly double [in 2024] alone.
Since that column was first published, U.S. battery storage capacity had an even better year in 2025.
If Burgum made one foolish comment about this years ago, because he wasnt up to speed on the relevant details, he could be forgiven for being confused. But the fact that he keeps making the same mistake, even after being presented with the facts, highlights the difference between ignorance and willful ignorance.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BURGUM: When the sun goes down, solar produces zero electricity HUFFMAN: I want to enter into the record this amazing [View all]
demmiblue
Yesterday
OP
Thanks for that. I don't have outside outlets and would like to have lights outside. Just hadn't thought it through
Amaryllis
20 hrs ago
#75
I am always asked this question, day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year.
NNadir
Yesterday
#36
I do not support DME from dangerous natural gas. As is the case with hydrogen itself, exergy is destroyed under...
NNadir
Yesterday
#55
Chornobyl converted me from being an uneducated antinuke to a well educated nuclear advocate.
NNadir
12 hrs ago
#93
If you remember the remark made by the nonscientist, Louis Strauss, the "bad guy" in the movie Oppenheimer...
NNadir
11 hrs ago
#94
The finest minds of the 21st century understand that nuclear energy is not the only form of sustainable energy.
thought crime
18 hrs ago
#84
We have a Nuke plant in Kansas and we've been RAPED by it on rates since 1985
Bengus81
9 hrs ago
#98
Hydrogen, whether generated by clean nuclear power or by so called "renewable energy" is a terrible idea as a...
NNadir
Yesterday
#41
Well the good thing about admitting one knows little - the excellent thing in fact - is that one's mind is open.
NNadir
Yesterday
#63
Hmm... the smell: would exposure be detrimental w all that lead or a short time there would prevent that
electric_blue68
Yesterday
#56
Once the lead is cast into plates and fixed into a cell it's no problem, so long as it stays there
jmowreader
18 hrs ago
#87
Magic in the sense that they would allow us to quit both fossil fuels and nuclear power.
hunter
18 hrs ago
#89
Sorry to disappoint, but "renewables" are less than 10% of China's primary energy...
hunter
6 hrs ago
#106
I have spent decades in the primary scientific literature and as a result, I have very little patience for handwaving.
NNadir
Yesterday
#62
I think we have talked about this before. I am hearing that there are companies that
PatrickforB
Yesterday
#46
The argument against renewable energy is an alternative form of climate change denial.
thought crime
Yesterday
#47
"the sole purpose of which is to assuage the guilt that affluent people feel for their environmentally destructive lifes
DBoon
18 hrs ago
#85
Yes, and when the sun goes down there is no photosynthesis and the plants all die.
dedl67
Yesterday
#35
I covered the absurdity of this argument previously, discussing the amount of cobalt required to cover a month of...
NNadir
Yesterday
#51
We're saved then!!!!! A lot has been written about these batteries it turns out, and a full commentary...
NNadir
9 hrs ago
#97
They are going to complain that some other power source is interruptable during
RockRaven
20 hrs ago
#77
For the next news flash - wind turbines stop generating when there is no wind!
Aussie105
20 hrs ago
#82
MaddowBlog-On renewable energy, Interior's Burgum offers a case study in willful ignorance
LetMyPeopleVote
3 hrs ago
#109