Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

._.

(1,866 posts)

24. It was 3x the going rate. THREE times. And the amount removed was $10,000 per month.

Reply to Nixie (Reply #23)

Wed Apr 22, 2026, 03:39 PM

16 hrs ago

Becerra knew this. He also knew the identity of his aide's wife, despite their use of different last names for the scam.

There's no evidence to say Becerra took any money himself, though, and he's still okay with me. I do hope he learned from it. Good luck to him, and good luck to you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CA: I think I will vote for , Xavier Becerra---Any scandals I don't know about that are out there or reason [View all] cally Tuesday OP

He's not as actively vocal against Silicon Valley Tech Bros as I'd like. haele Tuesday #1

Thanks cally Tuesday #3

IIRC, Becerra was looked at as a possible running oasis Tuesday #2

Is there any evidence that he knows cursive? Renew Deal Tuesday #4

An obvious question mark is... ._. Tuesday #5

I know about that one cally Tuesday #6

Becerra was never accused of any wrongdoing. Nor, was he ever caught on video of any wrongdoing. Nor... PeaceWave Tuesday #7

What a joke. That's dated Nov 2025, and it states very clearly Nixie Tuesday #8

Agreed. Xavier Becerra is rock solid. 68 years old with 35 years in public service... PeaceWave Tuesday #9

His story is very inspiring. I got a flyer from Steyer's campaign and Nixie Tuesday #12

Meaning it remains unanswered for all this time. ._. Tuesday #10

Thoughtful voters would read the article and see that he Nixie Tuesday #11

Then his efforts failed. It's really that simple. ._. Tuesday #13

Try not to conflate lower standards and different standards. Two separate concepts. Torchlight Tuesday #14

He has responsibility in this. To say otherwise is to hold a lower standard.. ._. Tuesday #15

Just a quick Google shows that the Politico article is lacking Nixie Tuesday #16

What's the first thing you'd point out from your post, that wasn't in the article? ._. Tuesday #17

You should read the case summary. The politico article Nixie Tuesday #18

Let me ask you something. ._. Tuesday #19

It's also not against the law to delegate to staff. I actually read what he instructed his staff to find about Nixie Tuesday #21

It was more than "a few thousand" and I'd hope you would know that. ._. 18 hrs ago #22

If you read the article, you would not misrepresent what the amount was. Go back and read it again. The monthly Nixie 17 hrs ago #23

It was 3x the going rate. THREE times. And the amount removed was $10,000 per month. ._. 16 hrs ago #24

It was $7,500 initially, which is a few thousand a month. Nixie 16 hrs ago #25

$10,000 was taken each month, with $7500 of that claimed as maintenance and... ._. 10 hrs ago #27

I just saw a poll today that both repubs lead in the race tishaLA Tuesday #20

I don't know of any scandals. He has my vote. LoisB 14 hrs ago #26

Resident for 40+ years... WarGamer 10 hrs ago #28