Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Nixie

(18,040 posts)

23. If you read the article, you would not misrepresent what the amount was. Go back and read it again. The monthly

Reply to ._. (Reply #22)

Wed Apr 22, 2026, 02:51 PM

Yesterday

amount was for a fee to maintain the account that he wanted his staff to research. Do you know why he wanted that researched? Did you read that part? The fee was not decided yet, but it states why the few thousand a month was being researched and it states the reasoning. It's all in the publicly available information. I'm not going to spoon-feed you facts of the case that you obviously don't read.

It's obvious you refuse to learn the facts of the case and you refuse to discuss the facts of the case. Your responses are just your own extrapolations. I'm sure glad you are not the one who decides what a "thoughtful" voter is.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CA: I think I will vote for , Xavier Becerra---Any scandals I don't know about that are out there or reason [View all] cally Tuesday OP

He's not as actively vocal against Silicon Valley Tech Bros as I'd like. haele Tuesday #1

Thanks cally Tuesday #3

IIRC, Becerra was looked at as a possible running oasis Tuesday #2

Is there any evidence that he knows cursive? Renew Deal Tuesday #4

An obvious question mark is... ._. Tuesday #5

I know about that one cally Tuesday #6

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #7

What a joke. That's dated Nov 2025, and it states very clearly Nixie Tuesday #8

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Tuesday #9

His story is very inspiring. I got a flyer from Steyer's campaign and Nixie Tuesday #12

Meaning it remains unanswered for all this time. ._. Tuesday #10

Thoughtful voters would read the article and see that he Nixie Tuesday #11

Then his efforts failed. It's really that simple. ._. Tuesday #13

Try not to conflate lower standards and different standards. Two separate concepts. Torchlight Tuesday #14

He has responsibility in this. To say otherwise is to hold a lower standard.. ._. Tuesday #15

Just a quick Google shows that the Politico article is lacking Nixie Tuesday #16

What's the first thing you'd point out from your post, that wasn't in the article? ._. Tuesday #17

You should read the case summary. The politico article Nixie Tuesday #18

Let me ask you something. ._. Tuesday #19

It's also not against the law to delegate to staff. I actually read what he instructed his staff to find about Nixie Tuesday #21

It was more than "a few thousand" and I'd hope you would know that. ._. Yesterday #22

If you read the article, you would not misrepresent what the amount was. Go back and read it again. The monthly Nixie Yesterday #23

It was 3x the going rate. THREE times. And the amount removed was $10,000 per month. ._. Yesterday #24

It was $7,500 initially, which is a few thousand a month. Nixie Yesterday #25

$10,000 was taken each month, with $7500 of that claimed as maintenance and... ._. 20 hrs ago #27

That's good you now take Becerra's word since your insinuations that Becerra somehow knew and allowed his Nixie 2 hrs ago #30

I just saw a poll today that both repubs lead in the race tishaLA Tuesday #20

I don't know of any scandals. He has my vote. LoisB Yesterday #26

Resident for 40+ years... WarGamer 20 hrs ago #28

Interesting cally 4 hrs ago #29