Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Graham Platner Went to Hell and Back. He Has a Simple Message for Democrats. [View all]
[img]
[/img]
By Ben Rhodes
Americans have a dysfunctional relationship with 21st-century wars. Most of us do not fight in them, see the carnage or live with their physical and psychological ruins. Yet we cannot heal our own nation unless we reckon with their monstrous futility. For Graham Platner, that reckoning began when he was a 20-year-old infantryman in Iraq. His company was constructing a patrol base near Falluja. To build it, they hired locals who often brought their kids to the work site. One day, a mortar round fired by insurgents landed where they were congregated. There can be no more senseless death than losing a child, a reality Mr. Platner had to confront as he administered first aid and then encountered distraught parents at a casualty collection point. He still remembers the sight, smell and feel of those lost children, as well as the anguish in their parents eyes.
Mr. Platner recalled this experience to me as he drove his truck through Maine, campaigning for the Democratic nomination for Senate. Last fall, his candidacy was rocked by revelations from his past. As a young Marine, he got a skull and bones tattoo on his chest that resembled a Nazi symbol (he denied knowing its meaning). His history on Reddit includes offensive comments that he attributes to a long process of dealing with the trauma of war. Yet while Democratic insiders in Washington were prepared to write him off, today he packs town halls, and polls show him leading Gov. Janet Mills of Maine by around 30 points. One reason for this success is that Mr. Platner sounds radically honest by the standards of American politics, including when he talks about his own service. Theres this thing I often think about, he said, recalling the incident near Falluja. Those kids were killed because we were spending money to build this base that probably doesnt exist anymore. His voice slipped into the present tense as he put himself back into the moment when the mothers arrived to pick up the remains, his own life in front of him like a storm cloud. How horrifically wasteful this is.
Visceral outrage over that reality infuses Mr. Platners opposition to the war in Iran. Sure, at campaign stops, he talks about high gas prices and the Trump administrations incompetence. But the core of his message is an unflinching disgust for the forever war we have waged since 9/11. Nobody is going to be able to convince me that what I did in Iraq and Afghanistan did anything for the people of Sullivan, Maine, he told me, punctuating his point with an obscenity. I dont want other young Americans to go through what Ive been through. And I dont want to send other young Americans to inflict the horror that I had to inflict on people.
Some Democrats do express a sense of moral outrage and urgency over the war: Ro Khanna, Jason Crow and Yassamin Ansari in the House, or Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen or Tim Kaine in the Senate. But many others, including the partys leadership in Congress, have shown less passion in opposing the war than they bring to fights over Obamacare subsidies. Turn on right-wing commentators like Tucker Carlson or Megyn Kelly and you hear a more aggressive stance. Mr. Platner has a particular scorn for this dynamic. He decried party leaders who focus on President Trumps failure to seek congressional authorization: Theres a big difference between saying the war shouldnt be happening because it is bad and saying the war shouldnt be happening because they didnt ask permission. He lamented the tendency to leaven statements against the war with lengthy condemnations of the Iranian regime that lay the ideological and propaganda basis for what Mr. Trump is doing. He also noted rightly that many Democrats have been longtime hawks on Iran, supporters of the Israeli government and allies with pro-war groups such as AIPAC.
All this undercuts Democrats ability to credibly argue for a fundamental shift in the nations priorities. The same dynamic applies to defense spending. For decades, Democrats joined Republicans in voting for an ever-growing Pentagon budget. Now, Mr. Trump has proposed an eye-popping $1.5 trillion in spending for his Department of War on top of the $200 billion the Pentagon has already requested for his war in Iran. Meanwhile, prices continue to rise, and cuts to health care, education and much else have left communities struggling to fill the gap.
More at https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/opinion/graham-platner-forever-war-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.c1A.aNIp.I-xkP0MB2Lw7&smid=nytcore-ios-share
Mr. Platner recalled this experience to me as he drove his truck through Maine, campaigning for the Democratic nomination for Senate. Last fall, his candidacy was rocked by revelations from his past. As a young Marine, he got a skull and bones tattoo on his chest that resembled a Nazi symbol (he denied knowing its meaning). His history on Reddit includes offensive comments that he attributes to a long process of dealing with the trauma of war. Yet while Democratic insiders in Washington were prepared to write him off, today he packs town halls, and polls show him leading Gov. Janet Mills of Maine by around 30 points. One reason for this success is that Mr. Platner sounds radically honest by the standards of American politics, including when he talks about his own service. Theres this thing I often think about, he said, recalling the incident near Falluja. Those kids were killed because we were spending money to build this base that probably doesnt exist anymore. His voice slipped into the present tense as he put himself back into the moment when the mothers arrived to pick up the remains, his own life in front of him like a storm cloud. How horrifically wasteful this is.
Visceral outrage over that reality infuses Mr. Platners opposition to the war in Iran. Sure, at campaign stops, he talks about high gas prices and the Trump administrations incompetence. But the core of his message is an unflinching disgust for the forever war we have waged since 9/11. Nobody is going to be able to convince me that what I did in Iraq and Afghanistan did anything for the people of Sullivan, Maine, he told me, punctuating his point with an obscenity. I dont want other young Americans to go through what Ive been through. And I dont want to send other young Americans to inflict the horror that I had to inflict on people.
Some Democrats do express a sense of moral outrage and urgency over the war: Ro Khanna, Jason Crow and Yassamin Ansari in the House, or Chris Murphy, Chris Van Hollen or Tim Kaine in the Senate. But many others, including the partys leadership in Congress, have shown less passion in opposing the war than they bring to fights over Obamacare subsidies. Turn on right-wing commentators like Tucker Carlson or Megyn Kelly and you hear a more aggressive stance. Mr. Platner has a particular scorn for this dynamic. He decried party leaders who focus on President Trumps failure to seek congressional authorization: Theres a big difference between saying the war shouldnt be happening because it is bad and saying the war shouldnt be happening because they didnt ask permission. He lamented the tendency to leaven statements against the war with lengthy condemnations of the Iranian regime that lay the ideological and propaganda basis for what Mr. Trump is doing. He also noted rightly that many Democrats have been longtime hawks on Iran, supporters of the Israeli government and allies with pro-war groups such as AIPAC.
All this undercuts Democrats ability to credibly argue for a fundamental shift in the nations priorities. The same dynamic applies to defense spending. For decades, Democrats joined Republicans in voting for an ever-growing Pentagon budget. Now, Mr. Trump has proposed an eye-popping $1.5 trillion in spending for his Department of War on top of the $200 billion the Pentagon has already requested for his war in Iran. Meanwhile, prices continue to rise, and cuts to health care, education and much else have left communities struggling to fill the gap.
More at https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/22/opinion/graham-platner-forever-war-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.c1A.aNIp.I-xkP0MB2Lw7&smid=nytcore-ios-share
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graham Platner Went to Hell and Back. He Has a Simple Message for Democrats. [View all]
BeyondGeography
21 hrs ago
OP
As long as he has REALY & SINCERELY left his racist, bigoted, misogynistic attitudes--as expressed
hlthe2b
20 hrs ago
#10
Does American society incubate Toxic Masculinity and give the idea birth ?
magicarpet
11 hrs ago
#74
The measure of strength is not about who we beat down but about who we lift up
Redleg
13 hrs ago
#54
"Send me to Washington and I will work tirelessly to rebuild the American military."
WhiskeyGrinder
20 hrs ago
#4
For a plain-spoken oysterman, his statements sure seem to take a lot of explaining.
WhiskeyGrinder
20 hrs ago
#6
Probably because all the disinformation to ruin the democrats chances to oust Collins?
Emile
20 hrs ago
#7
Platner leads Republican incumbent Sen. Susan Collins by 7 to 14 points (48% to 41%),
Emile
20 hrs ago
#12
If I hear "restructure," it makes me think layers of bureaucracy or departments or missions/scopes will be removed
WhiskeyGrinder
20 hrs ago
#11
"that definitely sounds like someone who's running as an anti-war candidate."
EX500rider
13 hrs ago
#52
Ben Rhodes, the author, was a foreign policy advisor in the Obama administration. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
20 hrs ago
#14
Graham Platner is running to grab the seat from GOPee (MAGA) leaning senior senator from Maine Sue Collins,for those,.
magicarpet
13 hrs ago
#56
Jesus Christ,... The damn Android operating system is editing my words because it,...
magicarpet
12 hrs ago
#59
"There's a big difference between saying the war shouldn't be happening because it is bad and
Nanjeanne
19 hrs ago
#18
I don't trust Platner. He has no relevant experience for being a Senator. I'm not sure why the Crooked folks are
LymphocyteLover
19 hrs ago
#21
I listen a couple times a week if it's something I'm interested in hearing.
mountain grammy
18 hrs ago
#37
Yes, I listen to Lovett or Leave It and also Pod Save the World. I haven't listened to Pod Save America after what they
LymphocyteLover
12 hrs ago
#62
I only read the first bit of this breathless excerpt from the NYT. How many Iraqi/Afghani children were murdered by US
erronis
19 hrs ago
#23
Graham Platner leading Governor Janet Mills in the Democratic Primary election, 55% to 28%.
Emile
19 hrs ago
#27
I think Platner's anti-war stance is sincere, and he has matured since his early offensive behavior
Martin Eden
18 hrs ago
#34
You have a valid point regarding experience, and lingering questions about his character.
Martin Eden
16 hrs ago
#45
It "resembled" a Nazi symbol?? SERIOUSLY?? -- No, sorry... it ABSOLUTELY IS a Nazi symbol!
QueerDuck
18 hrs ago
#36
LOL! Nailed it! I'm sure that's the same type of hair splitting that the NYT's editorial board does...
QueerDuck
11 hrs ago
#97
You will not find that wording in the NYT article because he did not have a swastika tattoo.
Celerity
13 hrs ago
#57
Exactly. The article says it 'resembled a Nazi symbol', of which there are many.
Abolishinist
11 hrs ago
#71
I don't trust a "Democrat" whose message trashes Congressional Dems and cheers for MAGAts
MorbidButterflyTat
13 hrs ago
#53
Fetterman is totally pro war backing Israel, platner is the exact opposite
questionseverything
11 hrs ago
#72
Mills is part of the old guard. Many Democrats want a renewed Democratic party.
Intractable
11 hrs ago
#84
Concerns could be mitigated if he was running for smaller office and built a strong verifiable record
themaguffin
12 hrs ago
#68
I do not understand why anyone is even entertaining the thought of supporting this guy over the extremely qualified and
Quiet Em
12 hrs ago
#70