Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

KNR niyad 22 hrs ago #1
Tribes protect valuable members. OC375 22 hrs ago #2
It's California Bettie 22 hrs ago #4
Agreed. OC375 22 hrs ago #5
Which makes the question posed in the article even more compelling. yardwork 22 hrs ago #12
If this was known Bettie 22 hrs ago #3
Yes. "Open Secret?" I certainly had not heard the rumblings but perhaps within the beltway... hlthe2b 22 hrs ago #6
"So, yeah. It appears the pump was fully primed on Friday within the circles who fully "knew" but amazing to me, did not WhiskeyGrinder 22 hrs ago #8
I Believe The Term Refers To Those Working With Or For Swalwell, Not "Us". ColoringFool 20 hrs ago #78
My daughter is a CA Dem delegate and a caucus chair, and she had never heard those rumors. deurbano 19 hrs ago #93
I concur. In this world there are "upstanders" snd Ninga 19 hrs ago #104
I have never come across any decent humans who are cheaters jfz9580m 17 hrs ago #124
Same here.... I guess 'open secret' meant within the House of Reps ONLY--- Jack Valentino 8 hrs ago #145
Exactly WSHazel 22 hrs ago #7
One of the reasons I didn't quite believe it at first Bettie 22 hrs ago #9
Madoff is the epitome of this behavior WSHazel 20 hrs ago #59
Broken stair analogy, plus organizations like to hold on to high performers, even when they're terrible people. WhiskeyGrinder 22 hrs ago #10
And the biggest missing stair in our politics happens to be President! (n/t) thesquanderer 19 hrs ago #94
Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a son with the family's housekeeper, kept the child a secret while he was sop 22 hrs ago #11
The sad fact is that a lot of men get away with it. yardwork 22 hrs ago #16
Thank you jfz9580m 21 hrs ago #27
Just to be clear, a lot of the "wait and see" was about not SEEING all the facts yet RandomNumbers 21 hrs ago #28
Wait and see is one thing. yardwork 21 hrs ago #31
Yes, I agree with you on that point. RandomNumbers 21 hrs ago #35
It has helped me make a final decision jfz9580m 20 hrs ago #77
"Immediately blaming every woman in sight is something else." MorbidButterflyTat 17 hrs ago #123
Nope. I'm not calling out any DUer. yardwork 15 hrs ago #128
There was someone here yesterday asking what was expected if a drunk woman goes to a man's hotel room EdmondDantes_ 21 hrs ago #45
Should be asking, why would a responsible man RandomNumbers 20 hrs ago #67
More than one poster suggested that the bank accounts of the victims needed to be investigated MichMan 20 hrs ago #68
The question was MorbidButterflyTat 17 hrs ago #125
That's not the post I was referring to EdmondDantes_ 15 hrs ago #129
I have seen post, that in my opinion suggest voting for him Lifeafter70 20 hrs ago #60
That's what stood out to me jfz9580m 20 hrs ago #82
It is VERY sad that a Democrat who has been so effective against Trump, Jack Valentino 8 hrs ago #146
Based on Arnold, obviously he had a good reason to think so. LisaL 20 hrs ago #62
I had no idea this was an open secret. Disgusting. Passages 22 hrs ago #13
People thought the party was taking crazy pills Sympthsical 22 hrs ago #14
I imagine the Republicans were hoping he'd be the nominee. yardwork 22 hrs ago #17
I still haven't heard a credible explanation from "The timing is suspicious!" crowd Sympthsical 22 hrs ago #19
There was a spontaneous eruption of that phrase on DU. yardwork 21 hrs ago #20
Hasn't hurt many of the GOP members samplegirl 22 hrs ago #15
The death of accountability is a good headline. yardwork 22 hrs ago #18
The difference between virtue signalling and actual virtue on full display Sympthsical 21 hrs ago #21
And every other woman in sight was blamed, too. yardwork 21 hrs ago #23
I think Katie Porter will actually be hurt by this Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #25
Absolutely. She's getting the Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris treatment. yardwork 21 hrs ago #37
There's another element here. She's running against a man people liked a lot who turned out to be a dog. Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #44
On the other hand - I suspect many Democratic voters will now see her as more of a sure bet peppertree 21 hrs ago #54
As a former CA member of the House, she was in karynnj 19 hrs ago #92
Probably true. Scrivener7 19 hrs ago #102
OMG, nobody said anything like that on here. MorbidButterflyTat 13 hrs ago #135
She clearly is being hit on this karynnj 19 hrs ago #90
Tribal reaction. Dems are not immune from it. paleotn 21 hrs ago #49
Exactly! This is not a game, folks. paleotn 21 hrs ago #43
there's been nothing but accountability from the party and Dem supporters, including Swalwell's bigtree 9 hrs ago #143
nothing in that article backed up the claim that 'His sexual misconduct was an open secret' bigtree 21 hrs ago #22
It was very much an open secret Sympthsical 21 hrs ago #24
That's sad. I wonder if this was known more than locally? Many will blow it off as "just gossip" LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #32
Unfortunately, it seems to be considered 'acceptable' for men to behave like that RandomNumbers 21 hrs ago #33
For years. Incredible, one would imagine he was the only politician they could back. Passages 21 hrs ago #36
Why encourage him to run for governor? MorbidButterflyTat 14 hrs ago #132
"Everybody just turned a blind eye and went about their lives for years?" Sympthsical 12 hrs ago #137
Kevin MCarthy on CNN question everything 21 hrs ago #52
not one of the sources I'd trust for anything bigtree 20 hrs ago #85
Whatever else is true about how "known" Swalwell's behavior was, My Kevin is not a reliable reporter. deurbano 19 hrs ago #99
Kevin MCarthy??? MorbidButterflyTat 14 hrs ago #131
I noticed the word "misconduct" people knew of his "misconduct" and chose to ignore it. But "misconduct" has now Ninga 20 hrs ago #66
Stop blaming Nancy Pelosi. yardwork 20 hrs ago #79
Excuse me. There are "upstanders" and "bystanders" Ninga 19 hrs ago #107
Exactly. No matter their last name or gender. N/T AloeVera 17 hrs ago #120
"Inappropriate" behaviour by a person in power is grooming. AloeVera 17 hrs ago #119
Here is a possible explanation karynnj 19 hrs ago #96
it's not clear anyone knew except the people claiming it was well known bigtree 17 hrs ago #121
Just because you didn't know... Random Boomer 19 hrs ago #100
internet gossip bigtree 17 hrs ago #122
There is this tweet from Dec 2025 LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #26
great reply Celerity 21 hrs ago #29
what did he do with that information bigtree 21 hrs ago #41
The answer is right in the article. Nanjeanne 21 hrs ago #47
more background as well Celerity 21 hrs ago #57
He's an interesting read. Did you see this one? Sympthsical 20 hrs ago #69
I figured as much. Unless Becerra finds rocket fuel and blows up out of his months-long 2 to 5 per cent level, it looks, Celerity 19 hrs ago #88
I see the problem with Becerra Sympthsical 19 hrs ago #97
"...what did both of these men do other than this political chit-chat on social media?" WhiskeyGrinder 21 hrs ago #48
that's still just conjecture bigtree 20 hrs ago #86
Because the victims had to come forward Sympthsical 21 hrs ago #51
That's how it was with Tony Gonzales. LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #70
Yep. Just like Weinstein and Ronan Farrow Sympthsical 20 hrs ago #81
The comments made by some poster here Lifeafter70 20 hrs ago #72
Humans gonna human Sympthsical 20 hrs ago #84
Threat of lawsuit? RoseTrellis 20 hrs ago #65
Wow. Passages 21 hrs ago #42
The Democratic Party doesn't allow this kind of behavor. Escape 21 hrs ago #30
True. Shades of Gary Hart. peppertree 21 hrs ago #46
Wait-a-sec mr715 18 hrs ago #111
Sure. peppertree 18 hrs ago #113
I'll have to check out Ms. Kelley's book. mr715 18 hrs ago #114
That could have something to do with it peppertree 18 hrs ago #116
Thanks for the insight mr715 14 hrs ago #133
You're very welcome peppertree 9 hrs ago #140
Well, The Democratic Party Apparently Does So "Allow," Until...., ColoringFool 20 hrs ago #80
True - but at least they have limits peppertree 19 hrs ago #105
Sent me to the all knowing internet to find out who Rielle Hunter is... Escape 13 hrs ago #136
Nobody wants to be the messenger. milestogo 21 hrs ago #34
That's true... LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #38
The Gary Hart of our times peppertree 21 hrs ago #39
My exact thought this morning. paleotn 21 hrs ago #50
Gary Hart may have been a reckless philanderer, but Jose Garcia 21 hrs ago #56
There's still issues of consent going after a parade of young women EdmondDantes_ 19 hrs ago #95
I believe the House introduced a resolution in 2018 prohibiting any sexual contact between a member and staff MichMan 19 hrs ago #103
Luckily for Lady G, it didn't apply to the Senate peppertree 19 hrs ago #106
"Accountability" only applies to Democrats. valleyrogue 21 hrs ago #40
Sad - but true. And you see that in many other democracies. peppertree 18 hrs ago #108
Gandhi??? LeftInTX 17 hrs ago #126
So Gandhi was quite the dandy. peppertree 9 hrs ago #141
Scene from the 1933 movie 42nd Street LeftInTX 8 hrs ago #144
If party leadership knew about this & didn't discourage him from running for gov, then they're complicit, too. CrispyQ 21 hrs ago #53
That's the part that got me Tree Lady 20 hrs ago #74
The weird thing is jfz9580m 21 hrs ago #55
He is resigning. Accountability is taking place. Martin68 20 hrs ago #58
Philandering is one thing but Billsdaughter 20 hrs ago #61
"Was an open secret for a long time" sunnybrook 20 hrs ago #63
The open secret appears to have been that he was sleeping around while married. LisaL 20 hrs ago #64
If higher ups in the party knew, they shouldn't have encouraged him to run for governor. LeftInTX 20 hrs ago #76
I agree. LisaL 20 hrs ago #83
I'd like to see those sources too MorbidButterflyTat 14 hrs ago #130
I think a lot of people just liked that Swalwell that was an attack dog against Trump and didn't care about much else MichMan 20 hrs ago #71
Too many people repeat everything Trump says and seem to believe it as well Just_Vote_Dem 20 hrs ago #75
that's not evident in anything bigtree 19 hrs ago #87
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan 19 hrs ago #98
"The rumors that are being discussed as being generally known are of consensual relationships, not sexual assault or WhiskeyGrinder 19 hrs ago #101
I never understood the Avenatti stanning. He always seemed like a plonker to me. I certianly never got invested in the Celerity 19 hrs ago #91
DURec leftstreet 20 hrs ago #73
I'm not a fan of situational ethics. democrank 19 hrs ago #89
Yes. And a horror I have heard applauded jfz9580m 18 hrs ago #112
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 18 hrs ago #109
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 18 hrs ago #110
I mean like, what 50 year old man sends dick pics to his girlfriends? Jersey Devil 18 hrs ago #115
This is another dispiriting revelation peggysue2 18 hrs ago #117
Power does strange things to some people MustLoveBeagles 11 hrs ago #139
I have counter evidence for the last sentence. My daughter endorsed Swalwell before hearing any rumors, then "quickly deurbano 17 hrs ago #118
Obviously most of us (in general public) LisaL 16 hrs ago #127
I certainly did not, even thoI fancy myself to be rather well informed. 3catwoman3 14 hrs ago #134
With all due respect Sympthsical 11 hrs ago #138
As The "Old Folks" Say..........🎶........ ColoringFool 9 hrs ago #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Swalwell and the Dea...»Reply #83