Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Celerity

(54,599 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2026, 08:06 AM Yesterday

Eric Swalwell and the Death of Accountability [View all]



His sexual misconduct was an open secret. So why was he still seen as a rising star in the party?

https://prospect.org/2026/04/12/eric-swalwell-death-of-accountability-sexual-misconduct/


California gubernatorial candidate Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) appears at a town hall meeting in Sacramento, California, April 7, 2026. Credit: Rich Pedroncelli/AP Photo

At a Democratic Club meeting in West Los Angeles on Saturday, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) was asked the question that every mildly engaged Democrat in the state is asking each other right now: What is your position on the Eric Swalwell situation? Since Friday afternoon, when the San Francisco Chronicle detonated a long-rumored bombshell by reporting a credible sexual assault charge, and CNN followed on with accounts from four different women (with more weighing in by the hour), everyone tangentially associated with California politics has had to take a side, and they all are taking the opportunity to throw Swalwell overboard.


All 21 members of Congress who had endorsed Swalwell had revoked that within 24 hours; the House Democratic leadership advised him to end his gubernatorial race; the head of the state Democratic Party did the same in a bit of an oblique way (“My call for all—repeat, all—candidates for Governor to ‘honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign’ still stands. In fact, that call is more important now than ever before”); the California Labor Federation, which had ridiculously endorsed four candidates for governor including Swalwell, dropped him from their roster, and two big union endorsers (the California Teachers Association and SEIU California, the latter of which had just started a super PAC for him with a $2 million investment) suspended their activities; two fundraisers in L.A. scheduled for Sunday were canceled; you can no longer donate to him on ActBlue or his campaign website; and even Swalwell’s senior staffers—including staffers for his current gubernatorial campaign—have said in an open letter that people should stand with the victims, and that they are only staying in their jobs to fulfill obligations to the congressmember’s constituents.

Waters did not diverge from the general trend. She noted that Swalwell was gaining momentum in the dicey California governor’s race, but that now “he’s got to go.” She also said that Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, who has personally asked Swalwell to drop out, had more stature to do so, because she “had been supporting him and raising money for him.” This is untrue; Pelosi never formally endorsed in the governor’s race and never fundraised for Swalwell, though he asked. The question that many have been asking is why the stampede away from Swalwell is happening so quickly, and there are a few different answers. First, in the wake of the Cesar Chavez revelations, there is absolutely no room to excuse away sexual assault, and the reporting is credible, thorough, and believable, enough to trigger an investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, because one of the assaults described in the reporting allegedly took place in New York.



Second, California Democrats have been nervous about the large field of Democrats in the governor’s race anyway. This fear lessened after President Trump endorsed Fox News commentator Steve Hilton, which will likely pull him away from Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and give a Democrat a chance to reach the top-two runoff in the June 2 primary. In other words, as California Democrats looked for a leader to get them out of this largely self-created mess of a primary, they found one in Donald Trump. But Swalwell imploding also winnows the field considerably and will make a Hilton-vs.-Democrat general election more likely. But there’s a third reason that Democrats are heading for the exits rapidly, and it’s one they won’t like to talk about. The truth, which will be available for all to see before long, is that Swalwell’s conduct with interns, young staff, and female fans was an open secret for a long time, and yet the party, if not Pelosi in this case specifically, had been supporting him and raising money for him. That speaks to a larger problem.



snip
146 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KNR niyad Yesterday #1
Tribes protect valuable members. OC375 Yesterday #2
It's California Bettie Yesterday #4
Agreed. OC375 Yesterday #5
Which makes the question posed in the article even more compelling. yardwork Yesterday #12
If this was known Bettie Yesterday #3
Yes. "Open Secret?" I certainly had not heard the rumblings but perhaps within the beltway... hlthe2b Yesterday #6
"So, yeah. It appears the pump was fully primed on Friday within the circles who fully "knew" but amazing to me, did not WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #8
I Believe The Term Refers To Those Working With Or For Swalwell, Not "Us". ColoringFool Yesterday #78
My daughter is a CA Dem delegate and a caucus chair, and she had never heard those rumors. deurbano Yesterday #93
I concur. In this world there are "upstanders" snd Ninga 23 hrs ago #104
I have never come across any decent humans who are cheaters jfz9580m 21 hrs ago #124
Same here.... I guess 'open secret' meant within the House of Reps ONLY--- Jack Valentino 12 hrs ago #145
Exactly WSHazel Yesterday #7
One of the reasons I didn't quite believe it at first Bettie Yesterday #9
Madoff is the epitome of this behavior WSHazel Yesterday #59
Broken stair analogy, plus organizations like to hold on to high performers, even when they're terrible people. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #10
And the biggest missing stair in our politics happens to be President! (n/t) thesquanderer Yesterday #94
Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a son with the family's housekeeper, kept the child a secret while he was sop Yesterday #11
The sad fact is that a lot of men get away with it. yardwork Yesterday #16
Thank you jfz9580m Yesterday #27
Just to be clear, a lot of the "wait and see" was about not SEEING all the facts yet RandomNumbers Yesterday #28
Wait and see is one thing. yardwork Yesterday #31
Yes, I agree with you on that point. RandomNumbers Yesterday #35
It has helped me make a final decision jfz9580m Yesterday #77
"Immediately blaming every woman in sight is something else." MorbidButterflyTat 21 hrs ago #123
Nope. I'm not calling out any DUer. yardwork 20 hrs ago #128
There was someone here yesterday asking what was expected if a drunk woman goes to a man's hotel room EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #45
Should be asking, why would a responsible man RandomNumbers Yesterday #67
More than one poster suggested that the bank accounts of the victims needed to be investigated MichMan Yesterday #68
The question was MorbidButterflyTat 21 hrs ago #125
That's not the post I was referring to EdmondDantes_ 19 hrs ago #129
I have seen post, that in my opinion suggest voting for him Lifeafter70 Yesterday #60
That's what stood out to me jfz9580m Yesterday #82
It is VERY sad that a Democrat who has been so effective against Trump, Jack Valentino 12 hrs ago #146
Based on Arnold, obviously he had a good reason to think so. LisaL Yesterday #62
I had no idea this was an open secret. Disgusting. Passages Yesterday #13
People thought the party was taking crazy pills Sympthsical Yesterday #14
I imagine the Republicans were hoping he'd be the nominee. yardwork Yesterday #17
I still haven't heard a credible explanation from "The timing is suspicious!" crowd Sympthsical Yesterday #19
There was a spontaneous eruption of that phrase on DU. yardwork Yesterday #20
Hasn't hurt many of the GOP members samplegirl Yesterday #15
The death of accountability is a good headline. yardwork Yesterday #18
The difference between virtue signalling and actual virtue on full display Sympthsical Yesterday #21
And every other woman in sight was blamed, too. yardwork Yesterday #23
I think Katie Porter will actually be hurt by this Scrivener7 Yesterday #25
Absolutely. She's getting the Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris treatment. yardwork Yesterday #37
There's another element here. She's running against a man people liked a lot who turned out to be a dog. Scrivener7 Yesterday #44
On the other hand - I suspect many Democratic voters will now see her as more of a sure bet peppertree Yesterday #54
As a former CA member of the House, she was in karynnj Yesterday #92
Probably true. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #102
OMG, nobody said anything like that on here. MorbidButterflyTat 18 hrs ago #135
She clearly is being hit on this karynnj Yesterday #90
Tribal reaction. Dems are not immune from it. paleotn Yesterday #49
Exactly! This is not a game, folks. paleotn Yesterday #43
there's been nothing but accountability from the party and Dem supporters, including Swalwell's bigtree 14 hrs ago #143
nothing in that article backed up the claim that 'His sexual misconduct was an open secret' bigtree Yesterday #22
It was very much an open secret Sympthsical Yesterday #24
That's sad. I wonder if this was known more than locally? Many will blow it off as "just gossip" LeftInTX Yesterday #32
Unfortunately, it seems to be considered 'acceptable' for men to behave like that RandomNumbers Yesterday #33
For years. Incredible, one would imagine he was the only politician they could back. Passages Yesterday #36
Why encourage him to run for governor? MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #132
"Everybody just turned a blind eye and went about their lives for years?" Sympthsical 16 hrs ago #137
Kevin MCarthy on CNN question everything Yesterday #52
not one of the sources I'd trust for anything bigtree Yesterday #85
Whatever else is true about how "known" Swalwell's behavior was, My Kevin is not a reliable reporter. deurbano 23 hrs ago #99
Kevin MCarthy??? MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #131
I noticed the word "misconduct" people knew of his "misconduct" and chose to ignore it. But "misconduct" has now Ninga Yesterday #66
Stop blaming Nancy Pelosi. yardwork Yesterday #79
Excuse me. There are "upstanders" and "bystanders" Ninga 23 hrs ago #107
Exactly. No matter their last name or gender. N/T AloeVera 22 hrs ago #120
"Inappropriate" behaviour by a person in power is grooming. AloeVera 22 hrs ago #119
Here is a possible explanation karynnj Yesterday #96
it's not clear anyone knew except the people claiming it was well known bigtree 22 hrs ago #121
Just because you didn't know... Random Boomer 23 hrs ago #100
internet gossip bigtree 22 hrs ago #122
There is this tweet from Dec 2025 LeftInTX Yesterday #26
great reply Celerity Yesterday #29
what did he do with that information bigtree Yesterday #41
The answer is right in the article. Nanjeanne Yesterday #47
more background as well Celerity Yesterday #57
He's an interesting read. Did you see this one? Sympthsical Yesterday #69
I figured as much. Unless Becerra finds rocket fuel and blows up out of his months-long 2 to 5 per cent level, it looks, Celerity Yesterday #88
I see the problem with Becerra Sympthsical 23 hrs ago #97
"...what did both of these men do other than this political chit-chat on social media?" WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #48
that's still just conjecture bigtree Yesterday #86
Because the victims had to come forward Sympthsical Yesterday #51
That's how it was with Tony Gonzales. LeftInTX Yesterday #70
Yep. Just like Weinstein and Ronan Farrow Sympthsical Yesterday #81
The comments made by some poster here Lifeafter70 Yesterday #72
Humans gonna human Sympthsical Yesterday #84
Threat of lawsuit? RoseTrellis Yesterday #65
Wow. Passages Yesterday #42
The Democratic Party doesn't allow this kind of behavor. Escape Yesterday #30
True. Shades of Gary Hart. peppertree Yesterday #46
Wait-a-sec mr715 23 hrs ago #111
Sure. peppertree 23 hrs ago #113
I'll have to check out Ms. Kelley's book. mr715 22 hrs ago #114
That could have something to do with it peppertree 22 hrs ago #116
Thanks for the insight mr715 18 hrs ago #133
You're very welcome peppertree 14 hrs ago #140
Well, The Democratic Party Apparently Does So "Allow," Until...., ColoringFool Yesterday #80
True - but at least they have limits peppertree 23 hrs ago #105
Sent me to the all knowing internet to find out who Rielle Hunter is... Escape 18 hrs ago #136
Nobody wants to be the messenger. milestogo Yesterday #34
That's true... LeftInTX Yesterday #38
The Gary Hart of our times peppertree Yesterday #39
My exact thought this morning. paleotn Yesterday #50
Gary Hart may have been a reckless philanderer, but Jose Garcia Yesterday #56
There's still issues of consent going after a parade of young women EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #95
I believe the House introduced a resolution in 2018 prohibiting any sexual contact between a member and staff MichMan 23 hrs ago #103
Luckily for Lady G, it didn't apply to the Senate peppertree 23 hrs ago #106
"Accountability" only applies to Democrats. valleyrogue Yesterday #40
Sad - but true. And you see that in many other democracies. peppertree 23 hrs ago #108
Gandhi??? LeftInTX 21 hrs ago #126
So Gandhi was quite the dandy. peppertree 14 hrs ago #141
Scene from the 1933 movie 42nd Street LeftInTX 13 hrs ago #144
If party leadership knew about this & didn't discourage him from running for gov, then they're complicit, too. CrispyQ Yesterday #53
That's the part that got me Tree Lady Yesterday #74
The weird thing is jfz9580m Yesterday #55
He is resigning. Accountability is taking place. Martin68 Yesterday #58
Philandering is one thing but Billsdaughter Yesterday #61
"Was an open secret for a long time" sunnybrook Yesterday #63
The open secret appears to have been that he was sleeping around while married. LisaL Yesterday #64
If higher ups in the party knew, they shouldn't have encouraged him to run for governor. LeftInTX Yesterday #76
I agree. LisaL Yesterday #83
I'd like to see those sources too MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #130
I think a lot of people just liked that Swalwell that was an attack dog against Trump and didn't care about much else MichMan Yesterday #71
Too many people repeat everything Trump says and seem to believe it as well Just_Vote_Dem Yesterday #75
that's not evident in anything bigtree Yesterday #87
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan 23 hrs ago #98
"The rumors that are being discussed as being generally known are of consensual relationships, not sexual assault or WhiskeyGrinder 23 hrs ago #101
I never understood the Avenatti stanning. He always seemed like a plonker to me. I certianly never got invested in the Celerity Yesterday #91
DURec leftstreet Yesterday #73
I'm not a fan of situational ethics. democrank Yesterday #89
Yes. And a horror I have heard applauded jfz9580m 23 hrs ago #112
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 23 hrs ago #109
How soon we forget Edwards and other Dem 'womanizers' JCMach1 23 hrs ago #110
I mean like, what 50 year old man sends dick pics to his girlfriends? Jersey Devil 22 hrs ago #115
This is another dispiriting revelation peggysue2 22 hrs ago #117
Power does strange things to some people MustLoveBeagles 16 hrs ago #139
I have counter evidence for the last sentence. My daughter endorsed Swalwell before hearing any rumors, then "quickly deurbano 22 hrs ago #118
Obviously most of us (in general public) LisaL 20 hrs ago #127
I certainly did not, even thoI fancy myself to be rather well informed. 3catwoman3 18 hrs ago #134
With all due respect Sympthsical 16 hrs ago #138
As The "Old Folks" Say..........🎶........ ColoringFool 14 hrs ago #142
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Swalwell and the Dea...