Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Eric Swalwell and the Death of Accountability [View all]

His sexual misconduct was an open secret. So why was he still seen as a rising star in the party?
https://prospect.org/2026/04/12/eric-swalwell-death-of-accountability-sexual-misconduct/

California gubernatorial candidate Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) appears at a town hall meeting in Sacramento, California, April 7, 2026. Credit: Rich Pedroncelli/AP Photo
At a Democratic Club meeting in West Los Angeles on Saturday, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) was asked the question that every mildly engaged Democrat in the state is asking each other right now: What is your position on the Eric Swalwell situation? Since Friday afternoon, when the San Francisco Chronicle detonated a long-rumored bombshell by reporting a credible sexual assault charge, and CNN followed on with accounts from four different women (with more weighing in by the hour), everyone tangentially associated with California politics has had to take a side, and they all are taking the opportunity to throw Swalwell overboard.
All 21 members of Congress who had endorsed Swalwell had revoked that within 24 hours; the House Democratic leadership advised him to end his gubernatorial race; the head of the state Democratic Party did the same in a bit of an oblique way (My call for allrepeat, allcandidates for Governor to honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign still stands. In fact, that call is more important now than ever before); the California Labor Federation, which had ridiculously endorsed four candidates for governor including Swalwell, dropped him from their roster, and two big union endorsers (the California Teachers Association and SEIU California, the latter of which had just started a super PAC for him with a $2 million investment) suspended their activities; two fundraisers in L.A. scheduled for Sunday were canceled; you can no longer donate to him on ActBlue or his campaign website; and even Swalwells senior staffersincluding staffers for his current gubernatorial campaignhave said in an open letter that people should stand with the victims, and that they are only staying in their jobs to fulfill obligations to the congressmembers constituents.
Waters did not diverge from the general trend. She noted that Swalwell was gaining momentum in the dicey California governors race, but that now hes got to go. She also said that Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, who has personally asked Swalwell to drop out, had more stature to do so, because she had been supporting him and raising money for him. This is untrue; Pelosi never formally endorsed in the governors race and never fundraised for Swalwell, though he asked. The question that many have been asking is why the stampede away from Swalwell is happening so quickly, and there are a few different answers. First, in the wake of the Cesar Chavez revelations, there is absolutely no room to excuse away sexual assault, and the reporting is credible, thorough, and believable, enough to trigger an investigation by the Manhattan district attorney, because one of the assaults described in the reporting allegedly took place in New York.
Second, California Democrats have been nervous about the large field of Democrats in the governors race anyway. This fear lessened after President Trump endorsed Fox News commentator Steve Hilton, which will likely pull him away from Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and give a Democrat a chance to reach the top-two runoff in the June 2 primary. In other words, as California Democrats looked for a leader to get them out of this largely self-created mess of a primary, they found one in Donald Trump. But Swalwell imploding also winnows the field considerably and will make a Hilton-vs.-Democrat general election more likely. But theres a third reason that Democrats are heading for the exits rapidly, and its one they wont like to talk about. The truth, which will be available for all to see before long, is that Swalwells conduct with interns, young staff, and female fans was an open secret for a long time, and yet the party, if not Pelosi in this case specifically, had been supporting him and raising money for him. That speaks to a larger problem.

snip
146 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes. "Open Secret?" I certainly had not heard the rumblings but perhaps within the beltway...
hlthe2b
Yesterday
#6
"So, yeah. It appears the pump was fully primed on Friday within the circles who fully "knew" but amazing to me, did not
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#8
I Believe The Term Refers To Those Working With Or For Swalwell, Not "Us".
ColoringFool
Yesterday
#78
My daughter is a CA Dem delegate and a caucus chair, and she had never heard those rumors.
deurbano
Yesterday
#93
Same here.... I guess 'open secret' meant within the House of Reps ONLY---
Jack Valentino
12 hrs ago
#145
Broken stair analogy, plus organizations like to hold on to high performers, even when they're terrible people.
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#10
And the biggest missing stair in our politics happens to be President! (n/t)
thesquanderer
Yesterday
#94
Arnold Schwarzenegger fathered a son with the family's housekeeper, kept the child a secret while he was
sop
Yesterday
#11
Just to be clear, a lot of the "wait and see" was about not SEEING all the facts yet
RandomNumbers
Yesterday
#28
There was someone here yesterday asking what was expected if a drunk woman goes to a man's hotel room
EdmondDantes_
Yesterday
#45
More than one poster suggested that the bank accounts of the victims needed to be investigated
MichMan
Yesterday
#68
It is VERY sad that a Democrat who has been so effective against Trump,
Jack Valentino
12 hrs ago
#146
I still haven't heard a credible explanation from "The timing is suspicious!" crowd
Sympthsical
Yesterday
#19
The difference between virtue signalling and actual virtue on full display
Sympthsical
Yesterday
#21
There's another element here. She's running against a man people liked a lot who turned out to be a dog.
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#44
On the other hand - I suspect many Democratic voters will now see her as more of a sure bet
peppertree
Yesterday
#54
there's been nothing but accountability from the party and Dem supporters, including Swalwell's
bigtree
14 hrs ago
#143
nothing in that article backed up the claim that 'His sexual misconduct was an open secret'
bigtree
Yesterday
#22
That's sad. I wonder if this was known more than locally? Many will blow it off as "just gossip"
LeftInTX
Yesterday
#32
Unfortunately, it seems to be considered 'acceptable' for men to behave like that
RandomNumbers
Yesterday
#33
For years. Incredible, one would imagine he was the only politician they could back.
Passages
Yesterday
#36
"Everybody just turned a blind eye and went about their lives for years?"
Sympthsical
16 hrs ago
#137
Whatever else is true about how "known" Swalwell's behavior was, My Kevin is not a reliable reporter.
deurbano
23 hrs ago
#99
I noticed the word "misconduct" people knew of his "misconduct" and chose to ignore it. But "misconduct" has now
Ninga
Yesterday
#66
I figured as much. Unless Becerra finds rocket fuel and blows up out of his months-long 2 to 5 per cent level, it looks,
Celerity
Yesterday
#88
"...what did both of these men do other than this political chit-chat on social media?"
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#48
I believe the House introduced a resolution in 2018 prohibiting any sexual contact between a member and staff
MichMan
23 hrs ago
#103
If party leadership knew about this & didn't discourage him from running for gov, then they're complicit, too.
CrispyQ
Yesterday
#53
If higher ups in the party knew, they shouldn't have encouraged him to run for governor.
LeftInTX
Yesterday
#76
I think a lot of people just liked that Swalwell that was an attack dog against Trump and didn't care about much else
MichMan
Yesterday
#71
Too many people repeat everything Trump says and seem to believe it as well
Just_Vote_Dem
Yesterday
#75
"The rumors that are being discussed as being generally known are of consensual relationships, not sexual assault or
WhiskeyGrinder
23 hrs ago
#101
I never understood the Avenatti stanning. He always seemed like a plonker to me. I certianly never got invested in the
Celerity
Yesterday
#91
