Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who is CHEYENNE HUNT, leading the charge against Swalwell? [View all]WhiskeyGrinder
(27,079 posts)44. Back in the day, sure. But nowadays both parties have to agree to them being used in a criminal case, and that's
assuming they're even allowed to be use (fewer than half of the states in the U.S. do so). They're just not reliable or useful.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't see how she's "leading the charge." It appears that she*, like many others in California politics, heard that a
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#1
A politician is making moves after news broke about another politician? Huh.
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#5
Oh sorry when you said "Katie Porter is leading the charge" and "a politician paid for news to be broken" I
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#11
Okay so what I'm hearing you say is that Katie Porter is leading a charge, and that a politician paid for news to be
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#17
"Bringing up something to destroy US Rep. Eric Swalwell's reputation on the eve of an important election is suspect."
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#25
Just fyi there are more than 1 accuser as well as family and friends corroboration in both CNN and Chronicle
Nanjeanne
Apr 12
#27
That's already been happening long before the staffer controversy by people holding a bitter grudge against her
SunImp
Apr 12
#33
Curious. What level or order of 'proof' would you consider sufficient to put this matter to bed?
stopdiggin
Apr 12
#28
Back in the day, sure. But nowadays both parties have to agree to them being used in a criminal case, and that's
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 12
#44
Trump found guilty in court of sexual assault elected President of the United States,
NoMoreRepugs
Apr 12
#31
Nonsense! (and a bit offensive) responsible sexual behavior is NOT beyond the realm
stopdiggin
Apr 12
#48